Preoperative magnetic resonance imaging identify feasibility of breast-conserving surgery for breast cancer patients

Liangsheng Liu,Shanshan He,Zhenhua Niu,Rui Yin,Yijun Guo,Zhaoxiang Dou,Wenjuan Ma,Zhaoxiang Ye,Hong Lu

DOI: https://doi.org/10.21037/gs-23-509

2024-05-31

Gland Surgery

Abstract:Keywords: Breast cancer; breast-conserving surgery (BCS); margin; magnetic resonance imaging (MRI); radiomics

surgery

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

Specimen Mammography for Intraoperative Margin Assessment in Breast Conserving Surgery: a Meta-Analysis

Chen Lin,Kai-yue Wang,Hai-lang Chen,Yu-hua Xu,Tao Pan,Yi-ding Chen

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-23234-5

IF: 4.6

2022-01-01

Scientific Reports

Abstract:In breast conserving surgery (BCS), specimen mammography is one of the most widely used intraoperative methods of assessing margin status. We performed a meta-analysis to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of specimen mammography. Literature databases including PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and EMBASE were searched prior to Jun 2022. A total of 1967 patients were included from 20 studies. A pooled analysis, heterogeneity testing, threshold effect testing, publication bias analysis, and subgroup analyses were performed from extracted data. The pooled weighted values were a sensitivity of 0.55 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.47-0.63), a specificity of 0.85 (95% CI, 0.78-0.90), a diagnostic odds ratio of 7 (95% CI, 4-12), and a pooled positive likelihood ratio of 3.7 (95% CI 2.6-5.5). The area under the receiver operator characteristic curve was 0.75 (95% CI 0.71-0.78). In the subgroup analysis, the pooled specificity in the positive margin defined as tumor at margin subgroup was lower than the other positive margin definition subgroup (0.82 [95% CI: 0.71, 0.92] vs. 0.87 [95% CI: 0.80, 0.94], p = 0.01). Our findings indicated that specimen mammography was an accurate intraoperative imaging technique for margin assessment in BCS.
Does Preoperative MRI Reduce Positive Margins after Breast-Conserving Surgery?

Ashley Cairns,Anees B. Chagpar,Elisabeth Dupont,Edward A. Levine,Jennifer S. Gass,Akiko Chiba,David W. Ollila,Marissa Howard-McNatt,Theodore Tsangaris,Carlos Garcia-Cantu,Adam C. Berger,Kristalyn Gallagher,Sharon S. Lum,Ricardo D. Martinez,Alliric I. Willis,Sonali V. Pandya,Eric A. Brown,Andrew Fenton,Amanda Mendiola,Mary Murray,Victor Haddad,Naveenraj L. Solomon,Maheswari Senthil,Hannah Bansil,Samuel K. Snyder,David Edmonson,Melissa Lazar,Jukes P. Namm,Fangyong Li,Meghan Butler,Noreen E. McGowan,Maria E. Herrera,Yoana P. Avitan,Brian Yoder,Tara McPartland,

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-023-13884-8

IF: 4.339

2023-07-28

Annals of Surgical Oncology

Abstract:BackgroundBreast-conserving surgery (BCS) is a mainstay for breast cancer management, and obtaining negative margins is critical. Some have advocated for the use of preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in reducing positive margins after BCS. We sought to determine whether preoperative MRI was associated with reduced positive margins.Patients and MethodsThe SHAVE/SHAVE2 trials were multicenter trials in ten US centers with patients with stage 0–3 breast cancer undergoing BCS. Use of preoperative MRI was at the discretion of the surgeon. We evaluated whether or not preoperative MRI was associated with margin status prior to randomization regarding resection of cavity with shave margins.ResultsA total of 631 patients participated. Median age was 64 (range 29–94) years, with a median tumor size of 1.3 cm (range 0.1–9.3 cm). Patient factors included 26.1% of patients (165) had palpable tumors, and 6.5% (41) received neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Tumor factors were notable for invasive lobular histology in 7.0% (44) and extensive intraductal component (EIC) in 32.8% (207). A preoperative MRI was performed in 193 (30.6%) patients. Those who underwent preoperative MRI were less likely to have a positive margin (31.1% versus 38.8%), although this difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.073). On multivariate analysis, controlling for patient and tumor factors, utilization of preoperative MRI was not a significant factor in predicting margin status (p = 0.110). Rather, age (p = 0.032) and tumor size (p = 0.040) were the only factors associated with margin status.ConclusionThese data suggest that preoperative MRI is not associated margin status; rather, patient age and tumor size are the associated factors.

oncology,surgery
Evaluation of Breast Cancer before Breast- conserving Surgery by Dynamic-enhanced MRI and Mammography

LIN Guang-wu,LIU Wei,JI Ming,LI Wei-ping,YE Chun-tao,ZHU Zhen-fang,ZANG Xue-ru

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1006-5741.2012.01.004

2012-01-01

Abstract:Purpose:To investigate the feasibility and value of MRI and mammography in assessing breast conserving surgery(BCS) of breast cancer.Methods:MR scanning and mammography were performed on 106 patients with breast cancer before operation.The location,size,extent,number of breast cancer,as well as the status of the skin of mammary gland,chest wall and axillary nodes were analyzed for all the patients on the MRI and mammography images.The macroscopic and microscopic features of these resected specimens were observed.The results of MRI,mammography and histopathology were comparatively analyzed to determine if they were eligible for BCS.Results:Forty patients(37.8%) were considered eligible for BCS by MRI alone and the diagnoisis accuracy of MRI was 96.2%.Thirty - seven patients(34.9%) were considered eligible for BCS by mammography alone and the accuracy was 89.6%. And when MRI was combined with mammography,41 patients(38.7%) were considered eligible for BCS and the accuracy was 97.2%.Conclusion:Combined dynamic - enhanced MRI with mammography can provide complete and accurate information on breast cancer for BCS.
Preoperative Prediction Power of Radiomics for Breast Cancer: A Systemic Review and Meta-Analysis

Zhenkai Li,Juan Ye,Hongdi Du,Ying Cao,Ying Wang,Desen Liu,Feng Zhu,Hailin Shen

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2022.837257

IF: 4.7

2022-01-01

Frontiers in Oncology

Abstract:Background: To evaluate the preoperative predictive value of radiomics in the diagnosis of breast cancer (BC).& nbsp;Methods: By searching PubMed and Embase libraries, our study identified 19 eligible studies. We conducted a meta-analysis to assess the differential value in the preoperative assessment of BC using radiomics methods.& nbsp;Results: Nineteen radiomics studies focusing on the diagnostic efficacy of BC and involving 5865 patients were enrolled. The integrated sensitivity and specificity were 0.84 (95% CI: 0.80-0.87, I-2 = 76.44%) and 0.83 (95% CI: 0.78-0.87, I-2 = 81.79%), respectively. The AUC based on the SROC curve was 0.91, indicating a high diagnostic value.& nbsp;Conclusion: Radiomics has shown excellent diagnostic performance in the preoperative prediction of BC and is expected to be a promising method in clinical practice.
MRI-based radiomic models to predict surgical margin status and infer tumor immune microenvironment in breast cancer patients with breast-conserving surgery: a multicenter validation study

Jiafan Ma,Kai Chen,Shunrong Li,Liling Zhu,Yunfang Yu,Jingwu Li,Jie Ma,Jie Ouyang,Zhuo Wu,Yujie Tan,Zifan He,Haiqing Liu,Zhilong Pan,Haojiang Li,Qiang Liu,Erwei Song

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-023-10144-x

IF: 7.034

2023-09-03

European Radiology

Abstract:Accurate preoperative estimation of the risk of breast-conserving surgery (BCS) resection margin positivity would be beneficial to surgical planning. In this multicenter validation study, we developed an MRI-based radiomic model to predict the surgical margin status.

radiology, nuclear medicine & medical imaging
Multicenter Prospective Study of Magnetic Resonance Imaging Prior to Breast-Conserving Surgery for Breast Cancer

Liu Qian,Liu Yinhua,Xu Ling,Duan Xuening,Li Ting,Qin Naishan,Kang Hua,Jiang Hongchuan,Yang Deqi,Qu Xiang,Jiang Zefei,Yu Chengze

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.issn.0366-6999.20132508

IF: 6.133

2014-01-01

Chinese Medical Journal

Abstract:Background This multicenter prospective study aimed to assess the utility of dynamic enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) prior to breast-conserving surgery for breast cancer.Methods The research subjects were drawn from patients with primary early resectable breast cancer treated in the breast disease centers of six three-level hospitals in Beijing from 1 January 2010 to 31 December 2012. The participants were allocated to a breast-conserving surgery group (breast-conserving group) or a total mastectomy group (total mastectomy group). Enhanced MRI was used to measure breast volume, longest diameter of tumor and tumor volume. The correlations between these measurements and those derived from histopathologic findings were assessed. The relationships between the success rate of breast-conserving surgery and MRI- and pathology-based measurement results were statistically analyzed in the breast-conserving group.Results The study included 461 cases in the total mastectomy group and 195 in the breast-conserving group. Allocation to these groups was based on clinical indications and patient preferences. The cut-off for concurrence between MRI- and pathology-based measurements of the longest diameter of tumor was set at 0.3 cm. In the total mastectomy group, the confidence interval for 95% concurrence of these measurements was 35.41%-44.63%. Correlation coefficients for MRI and histopathology-based measurements of breast volume, tumor volume and tumor volume/breast volume ratio were r=0.861, 0.569, and 0.600, respectively (all P <0.001). In the breast-conserving group, with 0.30 cm taken as the cut-off for concurrence, the 95% confidence interval for MRI and pathology-based measurements of the longest diameter of tumor was 29.98%-44.01%. The subjective and objective success rates for breast-conserving surgery were 100% and 88.54%, respectively.Conclusions There were significant correlations between dynamic enhanced MRI- and histopathology-based measurements of the longest diameter of breast lesions, breast and tumor volumes, and breast volume/tumor volume ratios. Preoperative MRI examination improves the success rate of breast-conserving surgery.
Value of Intraoperative Frozen Section Analysis in Re-Excision Margin Evaluation in Breast-Conserving Surgery for Cancer: a Single Institution Experience

Jian Guo Shen,Lin Bo Wang,Zi Nong Jiang,Xiao Ming Yuan,Wen He Zhao,Jun Shen

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12262-021-02952-6

2021-01-01

Indian Journal of Surgery

Abstract:Previous studies have demonstrated that in women with breast cancer treated with breast-conserving surgery (BCS), intraoperative frozen section analysis of lumpectomy margins results in a decrease in reoperation rates for margin control. However, the value of intraoperative frozen margin evaluation (FME) in re-excision margin analysis was not fully understood. We conducted a retrospective review of patients who underwent attempted breast-conserving surgery for breast cancer with routine intraoperative frozen margin evaluation at our institution between January 1998 and May 2016. The number of frozen margin evaluation was analyzed. We additionally analyzed factors associated with positive re-excised margins to identify correlations with patient characteristics. A total of 760 patients who underwent attempted breast-conserving surgery were routinely conducted intraoperative frozen margin evaluation, frozen sections were obtained from the initial margin only in 82.5% (n = 627), the initial margin as well as a one-time re-excision analysis in 15.8% (n = 120), or the initial margin and two or more re-excision analyses in 1.7% (n-13). Based on the results of frozen margin evaluation, 727 (95.6%) of the patients underwent breast-conserving surgery, while the remaining 33 (4.4%) converted to mastectomy. Among the patients who underwent breast-conserving surgery, 112 (15.4%) had an initial positive margin on a frozen margin evaluation, underwent one-time margin re-excision and achieved a margin-free status, while 1.6% underwent a second margin resection due to a positive result on the first re-excised margin. In total, 72.7% of the conversions to mastectomy were due to a positive initial margin. Univariate and multivariate analyses showed that patients with the ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) histological type were more likely to have repeatedly positive re-excised margins during breast-conserving surgery. Routine intraoperative frozen margin evaluation of re-excised margins provided only limited value in patients who underwent attempted breast-conserving surgery; this method may be beneficial in the subgroup of patients with the ductal carcinoma in situ histological type.
Characteristics And Prognostic Significance Of Preoperative Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Assessed Circumferential Margin In Rectal Cancer

Xiaoji Ma,Xinxiang Li,Linghui Xu,Debing Shi,Tong Tong,Dan Huang,Ying Ding,Sanjun Cai,Junjie Peng

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/410150

IF: 2

2015-01-01

Gastroenterology Research and Practice

Abstract:Purpose. To study the characteristics and prognostic significance of preoperative magnetic resonance imaging-(MRI-) assessed circumferential margin (CRM) in rectal cancer. Methods. Patients underwent preoperative high resolution pelvic MRI, followed by resection of primary tumor. The relationship between MRI- assessed CRM and pathological CRM (pCRM) was studied, and survival analysis was used to determine the prognostic significance of MRI- assessed CRM. Results. Of all the 203 patients, the total accuracy of MRI- assessed CRM for predicting involvement of pCRM was 84.2%, sensitivity was 50%, and specificity was 86.8%. Anterior tumors were more possible to assess involvement of CRM by MRI, while the false positive rate was significantly higher than lateral or posterior tumor (87.5% versus 50%, p = 0.0002). The 3-year local recurrence, disease-free survival, and overall survival rates were 35.6%, 58.1%, and 85.2% in patients with involved mrCRM, compared with 8.9%, 78.9%, and 92.3% in patients with clear mrCRM. In multivariate analysis, MRI-assessed CRM found an independent risk factor for local recurrence, with a hazard ratio of 3.49 (p = 0.003). Conclusions. High resolution MRI was accurate to assess CRM preoperatively, while anterior tumor should be assessed more cautiously. Involvement of mrCRM was significantly associated with local recurrence regardless of pCRM status.
Preoperative Breast MRI for Early-Stage Breast Cancer: Effect on Surgical and Long-Term Outcomes

Janice S. Sung,Jie Li,Glenys Da Costa,Sujata Patil,Kimberly J. Van Zee,D. David Dershaw,Elizabeth A. Morris

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.13.11355

2014-06-01

American Journal of Roentgenology

Abstract:OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of the use of preoperative breast MRI on surgical and long-term outcomes among women with early-stage breast cancer undergoing breast conservation therapy.MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective review yielded the cases of 174 women with stage 0, I, or II breast cancer who underwent preoperative MRI between 2000 and 2004. A control group of 174 patients who did not undergo preoperative MRI before breast conservation therapy was matched by age, histopathologic finding, stage, and surgeon. Features compared included breast density, presence of mammographically occult disease, margin status, lymph node involvement, lymphovascular invasion, extensive intraductal component, hormone receptor status, and use of adjuvant therapy. Outcomes, including rates of reexcision, ipsilateral recurrence, and disease-free survival, were compared by Kaplan-Meier methods and the log-rank test.RESULTS: Patients referred for preoperative breast MRI were more likely to have extremely dense breasts (28% vs 6%, p < 0.0001) and mammographically occult cancer (24% vs 9%, p = 0.0003). The two groups had identical rates of final negative margins, lymph node involvement, lymphovascular invasion, extensive intraductal component status, positive hormone receptor results, and systemic adjuvant therapy. Fewer patients in the preoperative MRI group needed reexcision (29% vs 45%, p = 0.02). The median follow-up period after treatment was 8 years. There was no significant difference in locoregional recurrence (p = 0.33) or disease-free survival (p = 0.73) rates between the two groups.CONCLUSION: Reexcision rates among patients with early breast cancer undergoing conservation therapy were lower among women who underwent preoperative breast MRI. There was no statistically significant effect of the use of preoperative MRI on rates of locoregional recurrence or disease-free survival.
Effects of preoperative magnetic resonance image on survival rates and surgical planning in breast cancer conservative surgery: randomized controlled trial (BREAST-MRI trial)

Bruna Salani Mota,Yedda Nunes Reis,Nestor de Barros,Natália Pereira Cardoso,Rosa Maria Salani Mota,Carlos Shimizu,Tatiana Cardoso de Mello Tucunduva,Vera Christina Camargo de Siqueira Ferreira,Rodrigo Goncalves,Maíra Teixeira Doria,Marcos Desidério Ricci,Angela Francisca Trinconi,Cristina Pires Camargo,Rachel Riera,Edmund Chada Baracat,José Maria Soares Jr,José Roberto Filassi

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-023-06884-5

2023-02-15

Breast Cancer Research and Treatment

Abstract:Breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has high sensitivity in detecting invasive neoplasms. Controversy remains about its impact on the preoperative staging of breast cancer surgery. This study evaluated survival and surgical outcomes of preoperative MRI in conservative breast cancer surgery.

oncology
Preoperative MRI Features Predict Failed Breast-Conserving Surgery: Construction of a Predictive Model

Yu-Hong Qu,Ying-Jian He,Xiao-Ting Li,Zhao-Qing Fan,Rui-Jia Sun,Xing Wang,Tao Ouyang,Ying-Shi Sun

DOI: https://doi.org/10.21037/tcr-21-1919

2022-01-01

Translational Cancer Research

Abstract:Background: Breast-conserving surgery (BCS) is the preferred method for early breast cancer, and the accurate preoperative prediction of the feasibility of BCS can formulate the surgical plan and reduce the violation of the patient's will. The present study proposed to explore the preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) features associated with failed BCS and constructed an MRI-based model to predict BCS. Methods: This retrospective study included patients between March 2015 and July 2016, who planned to undergo BCS, had preoperative MRI examination, and had at least 2 years of follow-up. A total of 30 patients with failed BCS were identified and matched with 90 patients with successful BCS (ratio 1:3) according to age, neoadjuvant therapy, and hormone receptor expression. The patients were divided into the training group for model construction and the testing group for model validation. The MRI features, including the site of the tumor, the lesion type, and the lesion and breast volume, were compared between failure and successful BCS groups. A multivariate logistic model for predicting failed BCS was constructed using independent factors associated with failed BCS from the training group and was evaluated in the testing group. The performance of the model was evaluated using the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Results: The mean age of the cohort was 45.7 +/- 10.3 years. A significantly more non-mass lesion and multifocality, the larger volume of lesion, and the ratio of lesion and breast volume were observed in failed BCS group compared to the successful BCS group. The ratio of lesion and breast volume and multifocality were independent factors associated with failed BCS, odds ratios were 1.044 (95% CI: 1.016-1.074) and 11.161 (95% CI: 1.739-71.652), respectively. An MRI-based model for predicting failed BCS was established, the area under the ROC curves in the training and testing group were 0.902 and 0.821, respectively. Conclusions: This model might help clinicians predict failed BCS preoperatively and make an accurate surgical strategy.
Can we do breast-conserving surgery without intraoperative frozen section of margin?

Dongyan Xu,Kaiyue Wang,Chen Lin,Dan Li,Chi Pan,Kaimin Hu,Huihui Chen,Fengbo Huang,Wei Tian,Yiding Chen,Tao Pan

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clbc.2024.01.019

IF: 3.078

2024-01-30

Clinical Breast Cancer

Abstract:Purpose This study was a retrospective and non-randomized study to assess the safety and reliability of identifying the surgical margin in breast cancer breast-conserving surgery (BCS) by using intraoperative ultrasonic location and specimen mammography instead of traditional intraoperative frozen pathological section. Methods Among the patients who underwent BCS from May 2019 to October 2021, according to the different methods of evaluating the intraoperative margin, 104 breast cancer patients were included in the frozen edge group, 53 breast cancer patients were included in the freeze-free group, and the surgeon judged whether extended resection was needed based on the results of pathological section or evaluation of intraoperative ultrasound and mammography. The surgical margins of the two groups were judged by postoperative pathological results as the gold standard. Results The median waiting pathology results time in the frozen edge group was 64 minutes, while the waiting time in the freeze-free group was 30 minutes, and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.0001). The postoperative pathological results showed that the positive rate of the surgical margin in the frozen edge group was 0.96%. The coincidence rate of intraoperative frozen and postoperative pathological results was 99.04%. The coincidence rate between intraoperative mammography and postoperative pathological results was 100%. Conclusions In BCS, the method of using intraoperative staining markers combined with mammography to evaluate the resection margin is highly accurate, reliable, economical and convenient, and at the same time reduces the waiting time of the operator during the operation. However, this was not a randomized controlled study, and there was patient selection bias, and its safety needs to be confirmed by long-term follow-up. In the future, it is expected to become the mainstream means of evaluating. Micro Breast-conserving surgery is recommended as a treatment for patients with early-stage breast cancer, but the positive margin is an important factor for recurrence. This study proposed a new method and assessed the safety and reliability of identifying the surgical margin in breast cancer breast-conserving surgery by using intraoperative ultrasonic location and specimen mammography.

oncology
Abstract PD15-08: PD15-08 Brazilian Randomized Study - BREAST-MRI Trial - Impact of Preoperative Magnetic Resonance in the Evaluation for Breast Cancer Conservative Surgery: Local recurrence and surgical outcomes

Bruna S. Mota,Yedda N. Reis,Nestor Barros,Natalia Cardoso,Rosa s. Mota,Carlos Shimizu,Tatiana Tucunduva,Rodrigo Gonçalves,Maira T. Doria,Vera Ferreira,Marcos Ricci,Angela Trinconi,Rachel Riera,Edmund C. Baracat,José Maria Soares,Jose Roberto Filassi

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs22-pd15-08

IF: 11.2

2023-03-01

Cancer Research

Abstract:Abstract Introduction: Breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has high sensitivity in detecting invasive neoplasms. However, controversy remains as to whether preoperative staging with breast MRI impacts surgical outcomes and local recurrence. Materials and Methods: BREAST-MRI is a randomized, open-label trial including female breast cancer patients older than 18 years old, with stage 0-III disease, eligible for BCS. We performed a 1:1 stratified randomization by breast density according to ACR-BIRADS to divide patients into two groups; one in which preoperative MRI was used and the control group where the MRI was not used. The primary outcome was local relapse-free survival (LR). Secondary outcomes were overall survival (OS), repeat operation, and the proportion of patients whose surgical management was modified to mastectomy. Results: 524 were randomized, 257 included in the MRI group, and 267 in the control group. The baseline characteristics were similar between groups, except for chemotherapy use (table 1). The survival analysis showed a 6-year local recurrence-free survival was 99.2% in MRI group versus 98.9% in the control group, p=0.702, overall survival of 95.3% in the MRI group versus 96.3% in the control group, p=0.481. No difference was found in reoperation rates, 22 (8.7%) in the MRI group versus 23 (8.7%) in the control group (p= 0.85)(table2). Surgical management changed in 21 ipsilateral breasts in the MRI group; 21 (8.3%) had mastectomies versus 1 in the control group (p< 0.01). Conclusion: Preoperative MRI evaluation increased the mastectomy rates by 8%. The use of preoperative MRI did not influence local relapse-free survival, overall survival, or reoperation rates Keywords: breast magnetic resonance imaging; breast cancer; conservative surgery; MRI accuracy, surgical outcomes, randomized clinical trial Citation Format: Bruna S. Mota, Yedda N. Reis, Nestor Barros, Natalia Cardoso, Rosa s. Mota, Carlos Shimizu, Tatiana Tucunduva, Rodrigo Gonçalves, Maira T. Doria, Vera Ferreira, Marcos Ricci, Angela Trinconi, Rachel Riera, Edmund C. Baracat, José Maria Soares Jr, Jose Roberto Filassi. PD15-08 Brazilian Randomized Study - BREAST-MRI Trial - Impact of Preoperative Magnetic Resonance in the Evaluation for Breast Cancer Conservative Surgery: Local recurrence and surgical outcomes [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2022 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2022 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(5 Suppl):Abstract nr PD15-08.

oncology
Efficacy of digital breast tomosynthesis combined with magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of early breast cancer

Yun Ren,Jiao Zhang,Jin-Dan Zhang,Jian-Zhong Xu

DOI: https://doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v10.i28.10042

2022-10-06

World Journal of Clinical Cases

Abstract:BACKGROUND: The incidence and mortality rate of breast cancer in China rank 120th and 163rd, worldwide, respectively. The incidence of breast cancer is on the rise; the risk increases with age but is slightly reduced after menopause. Early screening, diagnosis, and timely determination of the best treatment plan can ensure clinical efficacy and prognosis.AIM: To evaluate the clinical value of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) combined with digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) in diagnosing early breast cancer and the effect of breast-conserving surgery by arc incision.METHODS: This study was divided into two parts. Firstly, 110 patients with early breast cancer confirmed by pathological examination and 110 with benign breast diseases diagnosed simultaneously in Changzhi People's Hospital of Shanxi Province and Shanxi Dayi Hospital from May 2019 to September 2020 were included in the breast cancer group and the benign group, respectively. Both groups underwent DBT and MRI examination, and the pathological results were used as the gold standard to evaluate the effectiveness of the combined application of DBT and MRI in the diagnosis of early breast cancer. Secondly, according to the operation method, 110 patients with breast cancer were divided into either a breast-conserving group (69 patients) or a modified radical mastectomy group (41 patients). The surgical effect, cosmetic effect, and quality of life of the two groups were compared.RESULTS: Among the 110 cases of breast cancer, 66 were of invasive ductal carcinoma (60.00%), and 22 were of ductal carcinoma in situ (20.00%). Among the 110 cases of benign breast tumors, 55 were of breast fibromas (50.00%), and 27 were of breast adenosis (24.55%). The sensitivity, specificity, and area under the curve (AUC) of DBT in the differential diagnosis of benign and malignant breast tumors were 73.64%, 84.55%, and 0.791, respectively. The sensitivity, specificity, and AUC of MRI in the differential diagnosis of benign and malignant breast tumors were 84.55%, 85.45%, and 0.850, respectively. The sensitivity, specificity, and AUC of DBT combined with MRI in the differential diagnosis of benign and malignant breast tumors were 97.27%, 93.64%, and 0.955, respectively. The blood loss, operation time and hospitalization time of the breast-conserving group were significantly lower than those of the modified radical treatment group, and the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05). After 3 mo of observation, the breast cosmetic effect of the breast-conserving group was better than that of the modified radical group, and the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05). Before surgery, the quality-of-life scores of the breast-conserving and modified radical mastectomy groups did not differ (P > 0.05). Three months after surgery, the quality-of-life scores in both groups were higher than those before surgery (P < 0.05), and the quality-of-life score of the breast-conserving group was higher than that of the modified radical group (P < 0.05). In the observation of tumor recurrence rate two years after the operation, four patients in the breast-conserving group and one in the modified radical treatment group had a postoperative recurrence. There was no significant difference in the recurrence rate between the two groups (χ 2 = 0.668, P = 0.414 > 0.05).CONCLUSION: MRI combined with DBT in diagnosing early breast cancer can significantly improve the diagnostic efficacy compared with the two alone. Breast-conserving surgery leads to better cosmetic breast effects and reduces the impact of surgery on postoperative quality of life.

medicine, general & internal
The Application of Intraoperative Specimen Mammography for Margin Status Assessment in Breast‐conserving Surgery: A Single‐center Retrospective Study

Chen Lin,Kai‐yue Wang,Fang Xu,Yan Liu,Jin‐fan Li,Chi Pan,Kai‐min Hu,Wen‐hong Xu,Zhi‐gang Chen,Yi‐ding Chen,Tao Pan

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/tbj.13835

2020-01-01

The Breast Journal

Abstract:The Breast JournalVolume 26, Issue 9 p. 1871-1873 COMMENTARY The application of intraoperative specimen mammography for margin status assessment in breast-conserving surgery: A single-center retrospective study Chen Lin MD, Chen Lin MD orcid.org/0000-0001-6783-215X Department of Breast Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, ChinaSearch for more papers by this authorKai-yue Wang MD, Kai-yue Wang MD Department of Breast Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, ChinaSearch for more papers by this authorFang Xu MD, Fang Xu MD Department of Radiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, ChinaSearch for more papers by this authorYan Liu MD, Yan Liu MD Department of Radiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, ChinaSearch for more papers by this authorJin-fan Li MD, Jin-fan Li MD Department of Pathology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, ChinaSearch for more papers by this authorChi Pan MD, Chi Pan MD Department of Breast Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, ChinaSearch for more papers by this authorKai-min Hu MD, Kai-min Hu MD Department of Breast Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, ChinaSearch for more papers by this authorWen-hong Xu MD, Wen-hong Xu MD Department of Radiotherapy, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, ChinaSearch for more papers by this authorZhi-gang Chen MD, Zhi-gang Chen MD Department of Breast Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, ChinaSearch for more papers by this authorYi-ding Chen MD, Yi-ding Chen MD Department of Breast Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, ChinaSearch for more papers by this authorTao Pan MD, Corresponding Author Tao Pan MD 2311318@zju.edu.cn orcid.org/0000-0003-3058-2710 Department of Breast Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China Correspondence Tao Pan, Department of Breast Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine, No. 88 Jiefang Road, Hangzhou 310009, China. Email: 2311318@zju.edu.cnSearch for more papers by this author Chen Lin MD, Chen Lin MD orcid.org/0000-0001-6783-215X Department of Breast Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, ChinaSearch for more papers by this authorKai-yue Wang MD, Kai-yue Wang MD Department of Breast Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, ChinaSearch for more papers by this authorFang Xu MD, Fang Xu MD Department of Radiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, ChinaSearch for more papers by this authorYan Liu MD, Yan Liu MD Department of Radiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, ChinaSearch for more papers by this authorJin-fan Li MD, Jin-fan Li MD Department of Pathology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, ChinaSearch for more papers by this authorChi Pan MD, Chi Pan MD Department of Breast Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, ChinaSearch for more papers by this authorKai-min Hu MD, Kai-min Hu MD Department of Breast Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, ChinaSearch for more papers by this authorWen-hong Xu MD, Wen-hong Xu MD Department of Radiotherapy, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, ChinaSearch for more papers by this authorZhi-gang Chen MD, Zhi-gang Chen MD Department of Breast Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, ChinaSearch for more papers by this authorYi-ding Chen MD, Yi-ding Chen MD Department of Breast Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, ChinaSearch for more papers by this authorTao Pan MD, Corresponding Author Tao Pan MD 2311318@zju.edu.cn orcid.org/0000-0003-3058-2710 Department of Breast Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China Correspondence Tao Pan, Department of Breast Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine, No. 88 Jiefang Road, Hangzhou 310009, China. Email: 2311318@zju.edu.cnSearch for more papers by this author First published: 24 May 2020 https://doi.org/10.1111/tbj.13835 Funding information: This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant numbers: 81602716 and 81802628). Read the full textAboutPDF ToolsRequest permissionExport citationAdd to favoritesTrack citation ShareShare Give accessShare full text accessShare full-text accessPlease review our Terms and Conditions of Use and check box below to share full-text version of article.I have read and accept the Wiley Online Library Terms and Conditions of UseShareable LinkUse the link below to share a full-text version of this article with your friends and colleagues. Learn more.Copy URL Share a linkShare onFacebookTwitterLinked InRedditWechat No abstract is available for this article. Volume26, Issue9September 2020Pages 1871-1873 RelatedInformation
Target volumes comparison between postoperative simulation magnetic resonance imaging and preoperative diagnostic magnetic resonance imaging for prone breast radiotherapy after breast‐conserving surgery

Ying Jin,Changhui Zhao,Lizhen Wang,Ya Su,Dongping Shang,Fengxiang Li,Jinzhi Wang,Xijun Liu,Jianbin Li,Wei Wang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/cam4.6956

IF: 4.711

2024-01-23

Cancer Medicine

Abstract:Background This study investigated the differences in target volumes between preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRIpre) and postoperative MRI (MRIpost) for breast radiotherapy after breast‐conserving surgery (BCS) using deformable image registration (DIR). Methods and Materials Seventeen eligible patients who underwent whole‐breast irradiation in the prone position after BCS were enrolled. On MRIpre, the gross tumor volume (GTV) was delineated as GTVpre, which was then expanded by 10 mm to represent the preoperative lumpectomy cavity (LC), denoted as LCpre. The LC was expanded to the clinical target volume (CTV) and planning target volume (PTV) on the MRIpre and MRIpost, denoted as CTVpre, CTVpost, PTVpre, and PTVpost, respectively. The MIM software system was used to register the MRIpre and MRIpost using DIR. Differences were evaluated regarding target volume, distance between the centers of mass (dCOM), conformity index (CI), and degree of inclusion (DI). The relationship between CILC/CIPTV and the clinical factors was also assessed. Results Significant differences were observed in LC and PTV volumes between MRIpre and MRIpost (p 0.05) were found between CI and GTV, primary tumor volume‐to‐breast volume ratio, distance from the primary tumor to the nipple and chest wall, and body mass index. Conclusions Despite using DIR technology, the spatial correspondence of target volumes between MRIpre and MRIpost was suboptimal. Therefore, relying solely on preoperative diagnostic MRI with DIR for postoperative LC delineation is not recommended.

oncology
Interobserver variability of clinical target volume delineation in patients undergoing breast-conserving surgery without surgical clips: a pilot study on preoperative magnetic resonance simulation

Shuning Jiao,Yiqing Wang,Jiabin Ma,Jing Shen,Xi-Qian Zhang,Bing Zhou,Xiansong Sun,Haoran Xu,Xia Liu,Ke Hu,Fuquan Zhang,Xiaorong Hou,Jie Qiu

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-024-13076-x

IF: 4.638

2024-10-27

BMC Cancer

Abstract:In patients undergoing breast-conserving therapy without surgical clip implantation, the accuracy of tumor bed identification and the consistency of clinical target volume (CTV) delineation under computed tomography (CT) simulation remain suboptimal. This study aimed to investigate the feasibility of implementing preoperative magnetic resonance (MR) simulation on delineations by assessing interobserver variability (IOV).

oncology
Meta-analysis of pre-operative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and surgical treatment for breast cancer

Nehmat Houssami,Robin M. Turner,Monica Morrow

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-017-4324-3

2017-06-06

Breast Cancer Research and Treatment

Abstract:BackgroundAlthough there is no consensus on whether pre-operative MRI in women with breast cancer (BC) benefits surgical treatment, MRI continues to be used pre-operatively in practice. This meta-analysis examines the association between pre-operative MRI and surgical outcomes in BC.MethodsA systematic review was performed to identify studies reporting quantitative data on pre-operative MRI and surgical outcomes (without restriction by type of surgery received or type of BC) and using a controlled design. Random-effects logistic regression calculated the pooled odds ratio (OR) for each surgical outcome (MRI vs. no-MRI groups), and estimated ORs stratified by study-level age. Subgroup analysis was performed for invasive lobular cancer (ILC).ResultsNineteen studies met eligibility criteria: 3 RCTs and 16 comparative studies that included newly diagnosed BC of any type except for three studies restricted to ILC. Primary analysis (85,975 subjects) showed that pre-operative MRI was associated with increased odds of receiving mastectomy [OR 1.39 (1.23, 1.57); p < 0.001]; similar findings were shown in analyses stratified by study-level median age. Secondary analyses did not find statistical evidence of an effect of MRI on the rates of re-excision, re-operation, or positive margins; however, MRI was significantly associated with increased odds of receiving contralateral prophylactic mastectomy [OR 1.91 (1.25, 2.91); p = 0.003]. Subgroup analysis for ILC did not find any association between MRI and the odds of receiving mastectomy [OR 1.00 (0.75, 1.33); p = 0.988] or the odds of re-excision [OR 0.65 (0.35, 1.24); p = 0.192].ConclusionsPre-operative MRI is associated with increased odds of receiving ipsilateral mastectomy and contralateral prophylactic mastectomy as surgical treatment in newly diagnosed BC patients.

oncology
Preoperative magnetic resonance imaging-radiomics in cervical cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Linyong Wu,Songhua Li,Shaofeng Li,Yan Lin,Dayou Wei

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2024.1416378

2024-07-04

Abstract:Background: The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to evaluate the potential significance of radiomics, derived from preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), in detecting deep stromal invasion (DOI), lymphatic vascular space invasion (LVSI) and lymph node metastasis (LNM) in cervical cancer (CC). Methods: A rigorous and systematic evaluation was conducted on radiomics studies pertaining to CC, published in the PubMed database prior to March 2024. The area under the curve (AUC), sensitivity, and specificity of each study were separately extracted to evaluate the performance of preoperative MRI radiomics in predicting DOI, LVSI, and LNM of CC. Results: A total of 4, 7, and 12 studies were included in the meta-analysis of DOI, LVSI, and LNM, respectively. The overall AUC, sensitivity, and specificity of preoperative MRI models in predicting DOI, LVSI, and LNM were 0.90, 0.83 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.75-0.89) and 0.83 (95% CI, 0.74-0.90); 0.85, 0.80 (95% CI, 0.73-0.86) and 0.75 (95% CI, 0.66-0.82); 0.86, 0.79 (95% CI, 0.74-0.83) and 0.80 (95% CI, 0.77-0.83), respectively. Conclusion: MRI radiomics has demonstrated considerable potential in predicting DOI, LVSI, and LNM in CC, positioning it as a valuable tool for preoperative precision evaluation in CC patients.
Magnetic resonance imaging radiomics predicts preoperative axillary lymph node metastasis to support surgical decisions and is associated with tumor microenvironment in invasive breast cancer: A machine learning, multicenter study

Yunfang Yu,Zifan He,Jie Ouyang,Yujie Tan,Yongjian Chen,Yang Gu,Luhui Mao,Wei Ren,Jue Wang,Lili Lin,Zhuo Wu,Jingwen Liu,Qiyun Ou,Qiugen Hu,Anlin Li,Kai Chen,Chenchen Li,Nian Lu,Xiaohong Li,Fengxi Su,Qiang Liu,Chuanmiao Xie,Herui Yao

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ebiom.2021.103460

IF: 11.205

2021-07-01

EBioMedicine

Abstract:Background: in current clinical practice, the standard evaluation for axillary lymph node (ALN) status in breast cancer has a low efficiency and is based on an invasive procedure that causes operative-associated complications in many patients. Therefore, we aimed to use machine learning techniques to develop an efficient preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) radiomics evaluation approach of ALN status and explore the association between radiomics and the tumor microenvironment in patients with early-stage invasive breast cancer.Methods: in this retrospective multicenter study, three independent cohorts of patients with breast cancer (n = 1,088) were used to develop and validate signatures predictive of ALN status. After applying the machine learning random forest algorithm to select the key preoperative MRI radiomic features, we used ALN and tumor radiomic features to develop the ALN-tumor radiomic signature for ALN status prediction by the support vector machine algorithm in 803 patients with breast cancer from Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital and Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center (training cohort). By combining ALN and tumor radiomic features with corresponding clinicopathologic information, the multiomic signature was constructed in the training cohort. Next, the external validation cohort (n = 179) of patients from Shunde Hospital of Southern Medical University and Tungwah Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, and the prospective-retrospective validation cohort (n = 106) of patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy in prospective phase 3 trials [NCT01503905], were included to evaluate the predictive value of the two signatures, and their predictive performance was assessed by the area under operating characteristic curve (AUC). This study was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT04003558.Findings: the ALN-tumor radiomic signature for ALN status prediction comprising ALN and tumor radiomic features showed a high prediction quality with AUC of 0·88 in the training cohort, 0·87 in the external validation cohort, and 0·87 in the prospective-retrospective validation cohort. The multiomic signature incorporating tumor and lymph node MRI radiomics, clinical and pathologic characteristics, and molecular subtypes achieved better performance for ALN status prediction with AUCs of 0·90, 0·91, and 0·93 in the training cohort, the external validation cohort, and the prospective-retrospective validation cohort, respectively. Among patients who underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy in the prospective-retrospective validation cohort, there were significant differences in the key radiomic features before and after neoadjuvant chemotherapy, especially in the gray-level dependence matrix features. Furthermore, there was an association between MRI radiomics and tumor microenvironment features including immune cells, long non-coding RNAs, and types of methylated sites.Interpretation this study presented a multiomic signature that could be preoperatively and conveniently used for identifying patients with ALN metastasis in early-stage invasive breast cancer. The multiomic signature exhibited powerful predictive ability and showed the prospect of extended application to tailor surgical management. Besides, significant changes in key radiomic features after neoadjuvant chemotherapy may be explained by changes in the tumor microenvironment, and the association between MRI radiomic features and tumor microenvironment features may reveal the potential biological underpinning of MRI radiomics.

medicine, research & experimental

Preoperative magnetic resonance imaging identify feasibility of breast-conserving surgery for breast cancer patients

Specimen Mammography for Intraoperative Margin Assessment in Breast Conserving Surgery: a Meta-Analysis

Does Preoperative MRI Reduce Positive Margins after Breast-Conserving Surgery?

Evaluation of Breast Cancer before Breast- conserving Surgery by Dynamic-enhanced MRI and Mammography

Preoperative Prediction Power of Radiomics for Breast Cancer: A Systemic Review and Meta-Analysis

MRI-based radiomic models to predict surgical margin status and infer tumor immune microenvironment in breast cancer patients with breast-conserving surgery: a multicenter validation study

Multicenter Prospective Study of Magnetic Resonance Imaging Prior to Breast-Conserving Surgery for Breast Cancer

Value of Intraoperative Frozen Section Analysis in Re-Excision Margin Evaluation in Breast-Conserving Surgery for Cancer: a Single Institution Experience

Characteristics And Prognostic Significance Of Preoperative Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Assessed Circumferential Margin In Rectal Cancer

Preoperative Breast MRI for Early-Stage Breast Cancer: Effect on Surgical and Long-Term Outcomes

Effects of preoperative magnetic resonance image on survival rates and surgical planning in breast cancer conservative surgery: randomized controlled trial (BREAST-MRI trial)

Preoperative MRI Features Predict Failed Breast-Conserving Surgery: Construction of a Predictive Model

Can we do breast-conserving surgery without intraoperative frozen section of margin?

Abstract PD15-08: PD15-08 Brazilian Randomized Study - BREAST-MRI Trial - Impact of Preoperative Magnetic Resonance in the Evaluation for Breast Cancer Conservative Surgery: Local recurrence and surgical outcomes

Efficacy of digital breast tomosynthesis combined with magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of early breast cancer

The Application of Intraoperative Specimen Mammography for Margin Status Assessment in Breast‐conserving Surgery: A Single‐center Retrospective Study

Target volumes comparison between postoperative simulation magnetic resonance imaging and preoperative diagnostic magnetic resonance imaging for prone breast radiotherapy after breast‐conserving surgery

Interobserver variability of clinical target volume delineation in patients undergoing breast-conserving surgery without surgical clips: a pilot study on preoperative magnetic resonance simulation

Meta-analysis of pre-operative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and surgical treatment for breast cancer

Preoperative magnetic resonance imaging-radiomics in cervical cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Magnetic resonance imaging radiomics predicts preoperative axillary lymph node metastasis to support surgical decisions and is associated with tumor microenvironment in invasive breast cancer: A machine learning, multicenter study