Assessment of evidence based care and uniformity of practices through implementation of standardized medical protocols and guidelines in pediatric emergency departments
Areeba Sultan,Irfan Habib,Faizia Naseem,Hayat Bozdar,Ibrahim Shakoor,Shanti Lal,Ghulam Rasool Bouk
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajem.2024.06.010
Abstract:Objective: This study aims to assess compliance with medical protocols and outcomes, as well as determine the consistency in clinical practice across different Pediatric Emergency Departments (PED) in public sector hospitals of a low-middle income country. Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on patients presenting to PEDs of five public sector hospitals, namely Civil Hospital Karachi (PED 1), National Institute of Child Health (PED 2), Abbasi Shaheed Hospital (PED 3), Sheikh Zayed Hospital Larkana (PED 4), and Ghulam Muhammad Mahar College Hospital Sukkur (PED 5). The analysis covered a three-month period from February 1, 2023, to April 30, 2023. Patients diagnosed with Acute asthma, Sepsis, and Septic Shock during the study duration were included. Outcomes for each disease were evaluated based on compliance with standardized protocols.The statistical significance of data was measured by adding the p values. Results: 110,450 patients visited PED during the study period and mortality rate was 2% (n=2193). 12% (13,240) were diagnosed with the three diseases during the study period. Sepsis was on top (74%, n=9,751), followed by Septic Shock (14%, n=1898), and Acute Asthma (12%, n=1591). The overall compliance rate for the three diseases was 77% (n = 10,240). Adherence to standard protocols were 98% (n = 1561) for acute asthma, 85% (n = 8240) for Sepsis, and 23% (n = 439) for Septic Shock across the five emergency departments. Of the patients who were managed according to standard protocol, 31% (n = 3135) were discharged, 30% (n- 3094) were admitted, 11% (n = 1151) were referred, 15% (n = 1501) left against medical advice and 13% (n = 1359) did not survive. On the other hand, in patients where there was noncompliance to standard protocols, 27% (n = 805) did not survive, 27% (n = 807) were discharged, 24% (n = 710) were admitted, 8% (n = 260) were referred and 14% (n = 418) left against medical advice. The differences in adherence rates among the three diseases were statistically significant (p < 0.001). Conclusion: The overall mortality rate was 2% in these five emergency departments and the medical protocol was followed in every third patient out of fourth in those three diseases. The survival rate till ED disposition was doubled in those patients for whom medical protocols were followed as compared to those for non-compliant. The majority of PED demonstrated good compliance with standardized practices. However, this study identified areas that require attention and further training, especially early recognition and management of septic shock where compliances seem alarmingly low. Our data analysis indicates that adherence to guidelines has resulted in uniformity in clinical practice and the provision of early evidence-based quality care. Nevertheless, there is still room for improvement in ensuring consistent adherence to medical protocols in pediatric emergency settings and thus improving patient outcomes.