Abstract:Background Two barriers to effective enrollment decisions are low health insurance literacy and lack of knowledge about how to choose a plan. To remedy these issues, digital decision aids have been used to increase the knowledge of plan options and to guide the decision process. Previous research has shown that the way information is presented in a decision aid can impact consumer choice, and existing health insurance decision aids vary in their design, content, and layout. Commercial virtual benefits counselors (VBCs) are digital decision aids that provide decision support by mimicking the guidance provided by an in-person human resources (HR) counselor, whereas more traditional HR websites provide information that requires self-directed navigation through the system. However, few studies have compared how decision processes are impacted by these different methods of providing information. Objective This study aims to examine how individuals interact with two different types of health insurance decision aids (guided VBCs that mimic conversations with a real HR counselor and self-directed HR websites that provide a broad range of detailed information) to make employer-provided health insurance decisions. Methods In total, 16 employees from a local state university completed a user study in which they made mock employer-provided health insurance decisions using 1 of 2 systems (VBC vs HR website). Participants took part in a retrospective think-aloud interview, cued using eye-tracking data to understand decision aid interactions. In addition, pre- and postexperiment measures of literacy and knowledge and decision conflict and usability of the system were also examined. Results Both the VBC and HR website had positive benefits for health insurance knowledge and literacy. Previous health insurance knowledge also impacted how individuals used decision aids. Individuals who scored lower on the pre-experiment knowledge test focused on different decision factors and were more conflicted about their final enrollment decisions than those with higher knowledge test scores. Although both decision aids resulted in similar changes in the Health Insurance Literacy Measure and knowledge test scores, perceived usability differed. Website navigation was not intuitive, and it took longer to locate information, although users appreciated that it had more details; the VBC website was easier to use but had limited information. Lower knowledge participants, in particular, found the website to be less useful and harder to use than those with higher health insurance knowledge. Finally, out-of-pocket cost estimation tools can lead to confusion when they do not highlight the factors that contribute to the cost estimate. Conclusions This study showed that health insurance decision aids help individuals improve their confidence in selecting and using health insurance plans. However, previous health insurance knowledge plays a significant role in how users interact with and benefit from decision aids, even when information is presented in different formats.

Does targeted information impact consumers' preferences for value-based health insurance? Evidence from a survey experiment

Consumers' Perceptions And Choices Related To Three Value-Based Insurance Design Approaches

Bridging the gap: Experimental evidence on information provision and health insurance choices

More options, more problems? Lost in the health insurance maze

Investigating consumer hospital choice: Demand and supply-side levers could address health care costs

Unravelling Elements of Value of Healthcare and Assessing their Importance Using Evidence from Two Discrete-Choice Experiments in England

User Interactions With Health Insurance Decision Aids: User Study With Retrospective Think-Aloud Interviews

Payer perceptions and use of value assessment tools in the United States

The impact of health-care service guarantees on consumer decision-making: an experimental investigation

Giving more detailed information about health insurance encourages consumers to choose compromise options

Anticipated Benefit Termination and Health Care Consumption Responses: Evidence from a Quasi-Experiment

Do patients and other stakeholders value health service quality equally? A prospect theory based choice experiment in cataract care

What Attributes of Integrated Health Care for Mental Health Are the Most Important to Potential Consumers? A Relative Ranking Study

Consumers’ Decision on Perspective of Rationality Economics and Willingness to Demand Health Insurance

Untangling the perception of value in value-based healthcare - an interview study

Public preferences for the allocation of societal resources over different healthcare purposes

Randomized Experiments to Reduce Overuse of Health Care

Steering them softly with a quality label? A case study analysis of a patient channelling strategy without financial incentives

Self-stigmatization and treatment preferences: Measuring the impact of treatment labels on choices for depression medications

Mind the App: Information Design and Consumer Behavior

Impact of health insurance education program on health care professional students: An interventional study