Abstract:Introduction. Ponatinib is a third-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) employed in relapsed/refractory (R/R) and, more recently, also in newly diagnosed Philadelphia-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia (Ph+ ALL). Ph-like ALL is a genetically heterogenous subgroup that shares a common transcriptional profile, similar to that of true Ph+ ALL, though lacking the BCR::ABL1 rearrangement. Ph-like ALL is characterized by a poor prognosis, a high relapse rate and a worse overall survival if treated with standard chemotherapy. Several molecular pathways are involved, including JAK/STAT, CRLF2 and ABL-class mutations, providing a heterogeneous genetic landscape with very limited data on the subsequent clinical outcome. Few isolated cases of successful treatment of R/R Ph-like ALL with ponatinib have been reported, including also patients with lesions different from ABL-class mutations. Currently, ponatinib prescription in Italy is not allowed for Ph-like ALL. Patients and Methods. Between January 2019 and July 2023, 17 patients were candidate to receive ponatinib on a nominate compassionate use basis; data were collected in the context of the Campus ALL network in Italy. The criteria for inclusion were a diagnosis of Ph-like ALL, with either hematological or molecular evidence of disease, and a treatment period of at least 28 consecutive days of ponatinib. The Ph-like signature was based on the BCR/ABL1 like-predictor (Chiaretti et al, BJH 2018) and, whenever possible, targeted RNA sequencing. Final data were collected for 15 patients (2 patients were excluded due to a treatment period <28 days) treated with ponatinib either as a single agent or in association with immuno and/or chemotherapy. Results. All patients had common ALL. Eight of the 15 cases were classified as high risk or very high risk ALL at diagnosis; 10 were males, the median age was 28 years (14-66) and the median white blood count at diagnosis was 25.6 x10 9/l (2.7-317 x10 9/l). Targeted RNA sequencing was carried out in 10/15 cases: 7 presented gene fusions ( ABL-class mutations in 2, JAK2 mutations in 2, and CRLF2::P2RY8, IKZF1::DDC and RB1::RCBTB2 in 1 case each); 2 additional cases had a CRLF2 rearrangement, evaluated by FISH. Copy number aberrations analysis by multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) technology was performed in 12/15 cases: 5 cases had a IKZF1 plus signature, 6 had a IZKF1 loss, while 1 case was IKZF1 wild type. Ponatinib was started in first (n=2) or second (n=5) hematologic relapse in 7 patients (46%), with 3 also having an extramedullary disease; 7 additional patients (46%) were treated in first (n=5) or second (n=2) minimal residual disease (MRD) persistence/recurrence; finally, 1 patient was refractory to 3 subsequent lines of treatment. In 8/15 patients ponatinib was used as single agent or in association with steroids or intrathecal chemotherapy only, in 4 it was administered in combination with chemotherapy and in 3 with blinatumomab; 7 patients started ponatinib after having failed an allogeneic transplant (6 hematologic relapses and 1 molecular relapse). A complete hematological and molecular remission (MRD- CR) was achieved in 6 patients (40%); notably, 4 of these 6 cases carried a gene fusion (1 JAK2 rearrangement, 1 ABL-class fusion, 1 IKZF1::DDC and 1 RB1::RCBTB2); 2 further patients in hematologic relapse at the start of treatment achieved a MRD+ CR (1 patient had a ABL-class gene fusion). Thus, the overall response rate was 53%. Four patients were refractory, while 2 maintained a stable disease. After ponatinib-based treatment, 6 patients were allografted and 1 received a CAR-T cell infusion. The toxicity profile was mild: 3 patients developed a transaminitis, 1 also had a fungal pneumonia, and 1 an increase in pancreatic enzymes. At a median follow-up of 3 months (1-5), 10 patients are alive, 8 being in continuous complete remission. Conclusions. Treatment with ponatinib showed promising results in terms of CR achievement in a heavily pre-treated population of Ph-like ALL patients, with an acceptable toxicity profile. In a pre-transplant setting, ponatinib was effective as a bridge to cellular therapies in 7 out of 8 patients as intention-to-treat (ITT), thus suggesting that this strategy may represent an effective bridge to further therapies. To our knowledge, this is the largest cohort of adult Ph-like ALL cases treated with ponatinib so far reported.

Clinical outcomes in patients in any phase of CML treated with ponatinib in France—Data from the TOPASE observational study

Results of ponatinib as frontline therapy for chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase

Dose modification dynamics of ponatinib in patients with chronic-phase chronic myeloid leukemia (CP-CML) from the PACE and OPTIC trials

Use of Ponatinib Alone or Combined with Other Therapies in Relapsed/Refractory Ph-like Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia. a Campus ALL Real-Life Study

Venetoclax-ponatinib for T315I/compound-mutated Ph Plus Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia

A New Algorithm Integrating Molecular Response, Toxicity, and Plasma Level Measures for Ponatinib Dose Choice in Patients Affected by Chronic Myeloid Leukemia

Treatment-Free Remission after Ponatinib Cessation in Chronic Phase (CP) Chronic Myeloid Leukemia (CML) Patients. the Ponastop Observational Study

Real-life analysis on safety and efficacy of asciminib for ponatinib pretreated patients with chronic myeloid leukemia

The Real-World Outcomes of Ponatinib in 724 Patients with CML and Ph + ALL : A Post-Marketing Surveillance Study with a Special Interest in Arterial Occlusive Events in Japan

Ponatinib and blinatumomab for Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic leukaemia: a US, single-centre, single-arm, phase 2 trial

Real-world outcomes of ponatinib treatment in 724 patients with CML and Ph+ ALL: a post-marketing surveillance study with a special interest in arterial occlusive events in Japan

HJKC3-0006: Outcome of Patients with CML Treated on Second Line or Later Therapy in Routine Clinical Practice

Nilotinib efficacy, safety, adherence and impact on quality of life in newly diagnosed patients with chronic myeloid leukaemia in chronic phase: a prospective observational study in daily clinical practice

Ponatinib‐review of historical development, current status, and future research

Ponatinib in the Treatment of Chronic Myeloid Leukemia and Philadelphia Chromosome-Positive Acute Leukemia: Recommendations of a German Expert Consensus Panel with Focus on Cardiovascular Management

Addendum to the German Consensus Recommendations on Ponatinib in the Treatment of Chronic Myeloid Leukemia

Asciminib monotherapy in patients with chronic-phase chronic myeloid leukemia with the T315I mutation after ≥1 prior tyrosine kinase inhibitor: 2-year follow-up results

Decitabine, venetoclax, and ponatinib for advanced phase chronic myeloid leukaemia and Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute myeloid leukaemia: a single-arm, single-centre phase 2 trial

Efficacy and safety of bosutinib in previously treated patients with chronic myeloid leukemia: final results from the BYOND trial

Population Pharmacokinetics of Ponatinib in Healthy Adult Volunteers and Patients With Hematologic Malignancies and Model‐Informed Dose Selection for Pediatric Development

Outcomes of chronic myeloid leukemia patients after therapeutic failure to conventional tyrosine kinase inhibitors and asciminib