Abstract:Background: This scoping review accompanies our research study "The Experience of Health Professionals With Misinformation and Its Impact on Their Job Practice: Qualitative Interview Study." It surveys online health misinformation and is intended to provide an understanding of the communication context in which health professionals must operate. Objective: Our objective was to illustrate the impact of social media in introducing additional sources of misinformation that impact health practitioners' ability to communicate effectively with their patients. In addition, we considered how the level of knowledge of practitioners mitigated the effect of misinformation and additional stress factors associated with dealing with outbreaks, such as the COVID-19 pandemic, that affect communication with patients. Methods: This study used a 5-step scoping review methodology following Arksey and O'Malley's methodology to map relevant literature published in English between January 2012 and March 2024, focusing on health misinformation on social media platforms. We defined health misinformation as a false or misleading health-related claim that is not based on valid evidence or scientific knowledge. Electronic searches were performed on PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar. We included studies on the extent and impact of health misinformation in social media, mitigation strategies, and health practitioners' experiences of confronting health misinformation. Our independent reviewers identified relevant articles for data extraction. Results: Our review synthesized findings from 70 sources on online health misinformation. It revealed a consensus regarding the significant problem of health misinformation disseminated on social network platforms. While users seek trustworthy sources of health information, they often lack adequate health and digital literacies, which is exacerbated by social and economic inequalities. Cultural contexts influence the reception of such misinformation, and health practitioners may be vulnerable, too. The effectiveness of online mitigation strategies like user correction and automatic detection are complicated by malicious actors and politicization. The role of health practitioners in this context is a challenging one. Although they are still best placed to combat health misinformation, this review identified stressors that create barriers to their abilities to do this well. Investment in health information management at local and global levels could enhance their capacity for effective communication with patients. Conclusions: This scoping review underscores the significance of addressing online health misinformation, particularly in the postpandemic era. It highlights the necessity for a collaborative global interdisciplinary effort to ensure equitable access to accurate health information, thereby empowering health practitioners to effectively combat the impact of online health misinformation. Academic research will need to be disseminated into the public domain in a way that is accessible to the public. Without equipping populations with health and digital literacies, the prevalence of online health misinformation will continue to pose a threat to global public health efforts.

Strengthening scientific credibility in the face of misinformation and disinformation: Viable solutions

Strengthening scientific credibility against misinformation and disinformation: Where do we stand now?

Have we found a solution for health misinformation? A ten-year systematic review of health misinformation literature 2013-2022

Addressing Viral Medical Rumors and False or Misleading Information

Combating Health Misinformation in Social Media: Characterization, Detection, Intervention, and Open Issues

Systematic Literature Review on the Spread of Health-related Misinformation on Social Media

The social media Infodemic of health-related misinformation and technical solutions.

Digital Mis/Disinformation and Public Engagment with Health and Science Controversies: Fresh Perspectives from Covid-19

Fight a more contagious global epidemic-misinformation of COVID-19 (Preprint)

Combating Public Health Infodemics: Strategies for Misinformation Control and Evidence-based Communication

Toolbox of individual-level interventions against online misinformation

Lessons Learned From Interdisciplinary Efforts to Combat COVID-19 Misinformation: Development of Agile Integrative Methods From Behavioral Science, Data Science, and Implementation Science

Prevalence of Health Misinformation on Social Media-Challenges and Mitigation Before, During, and Beyond the COVID-19 Pandemic: Scoping Literature Review

Analysis of misinformation during the COVID-19 outbreak in China: cultural, social and political entanglements

Understanding and combatting misinformation across 16 countries on six continents

How can we combat online misinformation? A systematic overview of current interventions and their efficacy

Mitigating the influence of message features on health misinformation sharing intention in social media: Experimental evidence for accuracy-nudge intervention

Finding Strategies Against Misinformation in Social Media: A Qualitative Study

Intervention strategies for misinformation sharing on social media: A bibliometric analysis

COVID-19 Misinformation Online and Health Literacy: A Brief Overview

Trustworthy Misinformation Mitigation with Soft Information Nudging