Extended cost-effectiveness analysis of interventions to improve uptake of diabetes services in South Africa

Heather L Fraser,Isabelle Feldhaus,Ijeoma P Edoka,Alisha N Wade,Ciaran N Kohli-Lynch,Karen Hofman,Stéphane Verguet
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/heapol/czae001
2024-01-22
Health Policy and Planning
Abstract:Abstract The rising prevalence of diabetes in South Africa (SA), coupled with significant levels of unmet need for diagnosis and treatment, results in high rates of diabetes-associated complications. Income status is a determinant of utilization of diagnosis and treatment services, with transport costs and loss of wages being key barriers to care. A conditional cash transfer (CCT) programme, targeted to compensate for such costs, may improve service utilization. We applied extended cost-effectiveness analysis (ECEA) methods and used a Markov model to compare the costs, health benefits and financial risk protection (FRP) attributes of a CCT programme. A population was simulated, drawing from SA-specific data, which transitioned yearly through various health states, based on specific probabilities obtained from local data, over a 45-year time horizon. Costs and disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) were applied to each health state. Three CCT programme strategies were simulated and compared to a ‘no programme’ scenario: (1) covering diagnosis services only; (2) covering treatment services only; (3) covering both diagnosis and treatment services. Cost-effectiveness was reported as incremental net monetary benefit (INMB) using a cost-effectiveness threshold of USD3015 per DALY for SA, while FRP outcomes were reported as catastrophic health expenditure (CHE) cases averted. Distributions of the outcomes were reported by income quintile and sex. Covering both diagnosis and treatment services for the bottom two quintiles resulted in the greatest INMB (USD22 per person) and the greatest CHE cases averted. There were greater FRP benefits for women compared to men. A CCT programme covering diabetes diagnosis and treatment services was found to be cost-effective, when provided to the poorest 40% of the SA population. ECEA provides a useful platform for including equity considerations to inform priority setting and implementation policies in SA.
health care sciences & services,health policy & services
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The paper aims to address the issue of underutilization of diabetes services in South Africa, particularly in terms of diagnosis and treatment. Since income status is a key factor affecting the utilization of diabetes services, transportation costs and wage losses due to taking sick leave become major barriers to seeking care. To improve service utilization, the study proposes a Conditional Cash Transfer (CCT) program designed to compensate for these costs. Using the Extended Cost-Effectiveness Analysis (ECEA) method, the study compares the costs, health benefits, and financial risk protection (FRP) attributes of different CCT program strategies. Specifically, the study simulates three CCT program strategies: 1. Covering only diagnostic services; 2. Covering only treatment services; 3. Covering both diagnostic and treatment services. These strategies are compared with a "no program" scenario to evaluate their performance in terms of cost-effectiveness and financial risk protection. The study particularly focuses on the impact of these strategies on the poorest 40% of the population and analyzes the distributional benefits across different income quintiles and genders.