Abstract:Background Digital health technologies (ie, the integration of digital technology and health information) aim to increase the efficiency of health care delivery; they are rapidly adapting to health care contexts to provide improved medical services for citizens. However, contrary to expectations, their rapid adoption appears to have led to health inequities, with differences in health conditions or inequality in the distribution of health care resources among different populations. Objective This scoping review aims to identify and describe the inequities of health care services brought about by the adoption of digital health technologies. The factors influencing such inequities, as well as the corresponding countermeasures to ensure health equity among different groups of citizens, were also studied. Methods Primary studies and literature, including articles and reviews, published in English between 1990 and 2020 were retrieved using appropriate search strategies across the following three electronic databases: Clarivate Analytics’ Web of Science, PubMed, and Scopus. Data management was performed by two authors (RY and WZ) using Thomson Endnote (Clarivate Analytics, Inc), by systematically screening and identifying eligible articles for this study. Any conflicts of opinion were resolved through discussions with the corresponding author. A qualitative descriptive synthesis was performed to determine the outcomes of this scoping review. Results A total of 2325 studies were collected during the search process, of which 41 (1.76%) papers were identified for further analysis. The quantity of literature increased until 2016, with a peak in 2020. The United States, the United Kingdom, and Norway ranked among the top 3 countries for publication output. Health inequities caused by the adoption of digital health technologies in health care services can be reflected in the following two dimensions: the inability of citizens to obtain and adopt technology and the different disease outcomes found among citizens under technical intervention measures. The factors that influenced inequities included age, race, region, economy, and education level, together with health conditions and eHealth literacy. Finally, action can be taken to alleviate inequities in the future by government agencies and medical institutions (eg, establishing national health insurance), digital health technology providers (eg, designing high-quality tools), and health care service recipients (eg, developing skills to access digital technologies). Conclusions The application of digital health technologies in health care services has caused inequities to some extent. However, existing research has certain limitations. The findings provide a comprehensive starting point for future research, allowing for further investigation into how digital health technologies may influence the unequal distribution of health care services. The interaction between individual subjective factors as well as social support and influencing factors should be included in future studies. Specifically, access to and availability of digital health technologies for socially disadvantaged groups should be of paramount importance.

Opportunity and accessibility: an environmental scan of publicly available data repositories to address disparities in healthcare decision-making

Digital Determinants of Health: Health data poverty amplifies existing health disparities—A scoping review

Big Data and Oral Health Disparities: A Critical Appraisal

Inequities in Health Care Services Caused by the Adoption of Digital Health Technologies: Scoping Review

Assessing Electronic Health Records for Describing Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities: A Research Note

Big data analytics in the healthcare sector: Opportunities and challenges in developing countries. A literature review

Addressing the Digital Divide in Health Education: A Systematic Review

Availability of information needed to evaluate algorithmic fairness - A systematic review of publicly accessible critical care databases

Revealing transparency gaps in publicly available COVID-19 datasets used for medical artificial intelligence development—a systematic review

Diversity and inclusion: A hidden additional benefit of Open Data

Inequity in Access and Delivery of Virtual Care Interventions: A Scoping Review

The role of increasing synchronous telehealth use during the COVID-19 pandemic on disparities in access to healthcare: A systematic review

Interactive visualization tool to understand and monitor health disparities in diabetes care and outcomes

A Survey on Optimization and Machine Learning-Based Fair Decision Making in Healthcare

App-Based Digital Health Equity Determinants According to Ecological Models: Scoping Review

Big Data Analytics and the Struggle for Equity in Health Care: The Promise and Perils

Health Resource Utilisation and Disparities: an Ecological Study of Admission Patterns Across Ethnicity in England Between 2017 and 2020

Enriching Real-world Data with Social Determinants of Health for Health Outcomes and Health Equity: Successes, Challenges, and Opportunities

The value of standards for health datasets in artificial intelligence-based applications

The bias algorithm: how AI in healthcare exacerbates ethnic and racial disparities – a scoping review

Data Equity as a Building Block for Health Equity: Improving Surveillance Data for People With Disabilities, With Substance Use Disorder, or Experiencing Homelessness, United States