Causal relationship between type 2 diabetes mellitus and aortic dissection: insights from two-sample Mendelian randomization and mediation analysis

Weizong Zhang,Jindong Sun,Huamin Yu,Minjuan Shi,Haiqiang Hu,Hong Yuan
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2024.1405517
IF: 6.055
2024-05-14
Frontiers in Endocrinology
Abstract:Objective: Some evidence suggests a reduced prevalence of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) in patients with aortic dissection (AD), a catastrophic cardiovascular illness, compared to general population. However, the conclusions were inconsistent, and the causal relationship between T2DM and AD remains unclear. Methods: In this study, we aimed to explore the causal relationship between T2DM and AD using bidirectional Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis. Mediation MR analysis was conducted to explore and quantify the possible mediation effects of 1400 metabolites in T2DM and AD. Results: The results of 26 datasets showed no causal relationship between T2DM and AD ( P >0.05). Only one dataset (ebi-a-GCST90006934) showed that T2DM was a protective factor for AD (I9-AORTDIS) (OR=0.815, 95%CI: 0.692-0.960, P =0.014), and did not show horizontal pleiotropy ( P =0.808) and heterogeneity ( P =0.525). Vanillic acid glycine plays a mediator in the causal relationship between T2DM and AD. The mediator effect for vanillic acid glycine levels was -0.023 (95%CI: -0.066-0.021). Conclusion: From the perspective of MR analysis, there might not be a causal relationship between T2DM and AD, and T2DM might not be a protective factor for AD. If a causal relationship does exist between T2DM and AD, with T2DM serving as a protective factor, vanillic acid glycine may act as a mediator and enhance such a protective effect.
endocrinology & metabolism
What problem does this paper attempt to address?