Abstract:Objective: Type B aortic dissection (TBAD) complicated by malperfusion carries high morbidity and mortality. The present study was undertaken to compare the characteristics of malperfusion and uncomplicated cohorts and to evaluate the long-term differences in survival using a granular, national registry. Methods: Patients with TBAD entered into the thoracic endovascular aortic repair/complex endovascular aortic repair module of the Vascular Quality Initiative from 2010 to 2019 were included. The demographic, radiographic, operative, postoperative, in-hospital, and long-term reintervention data were compared between the malperfusion and uncomplicated TBAD groups using t tests and χ2 analysis, as appropriate. Overall survival was compared using Cox regression to generate survival curves. Results: Of the 2820 included patients, 2267 had uncomplicated TBAD and 553 had malperfusion. The patients with malperfusion were younger (age, 55.8 vs 61.2 years; P < .001), were more often male (79.7% vs 68.1%; P < .001), had a higher preoperative creatinine (1.8 vs 1.1 mg/dL; P < .001), had more often presented with an American Society of Anesthesiologists class of 4 or 5 (81.9% vs 58.4%; P < .001), and had more often presented with urgent status (77.4% vs 32.8%; P < .001). In contrast, the uncomplicated TBAD group had had more medical comorbidities, including coronary artery disease and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and a larger aortic diameter (4.0 cm vs 4.9 cm; P < .001). The malperfusion group more frequently had proximal zones of disease in zones 0 to 2 (38.6% vs 31.5%; P = .002) and distal zones of disease in zones 9 and above (78.7% vs 46.2%; P < .001), with a greater number of aortic zones traversed (7.7 vs 5.1; P < .001) and a greater frequency of dissection extension into branch vessels (61.8% vs 23.1%; P < .001). Patients with malperfusion also exhibited greater case complexity, with a greater need for branch vessel stenting and longer procedure times. The overall incidence of postoperative complications was greater in the malperfusion group (39.4% vs 17.1%; P < .001) and included a greater rate of spinal cord ischemia (6.3% vs 2.2%; P < .001), acute kidney injury (10.4% vs 0.9%; P < .001), and in-hospital mortality (11.6% vs 5.6%; P < .001). In-hospital reintervention was also greater for the malperfusion patients (14.5% vs 7.4%; P < .001), although the incidence of long-term reinterventions was similar between the two groups (8.7% vs 9.7%; P = .548). A proximal zone of disease in zone 0 to 2 was associated with decreased survival. In contrast, a distal zone of disease in 9 and above, in-hospital reintervention, and long-term follow-up were associated with increased survival. Despite these differences, long-term survival did not differ between the malperfusion and uncomplicated groups (P = .320.) CONCLUSIONS: Patients presenting with TBAD and malperfusion represent a unique cohort. Despite the greater need for branch vessel stenting and in-hospital reintervention, they had similar long-term reintervention rates and survival compared with those with uncomplicated TBAD. These data lend insight with regard to the observed differences between uncomplicated and malperfusion TBAD.

Prognostic impact of branch vessel involvement on organ malperfusion and mid-term survival in patients with acute type a aortic dissection

Prognostic Impact of Branch Vessel Involvement on Computed Tomography versus Clinical Presentation of Malperfusion in Patients With Type a Acute Aortic Dissection

Influence of Primary Intimal Tear Location in Type B Aortic Dissection As a Factor Portending Retrograde Type A Aortic Dissection after Endovascular Repair

Visceral and renal malperfusion syndromes in acute aortic dissection type A: the fate of the branch vessel

Analysis of outcomes and prognostic factor in acute type A aortic dissection complicated with preoperative shock: A single-center study

Outcomes of patients with acute type A aortic dissection and concomitant lower extremity malperfusion

Treatment Strategies for Acute Aortic Dissection With Malperfusion: A Retrospective Study

Clinical Analysis of Risk Factors for Mortality in Type A Acute Aortic Dissection: A Single Study From China

Anatomic data and clinical significance analysis of 150 cases of type A aortic dissection

Coronary artery disease as an independent predictor of short-term and long-term outcomes in patients with type-B aortic dissection undergoing thoracic endovascular repair

Prevalence, Clinical Features and Outcomes of Patients with Acute Aortic Dissection and Concomitant Lower Extremity Malperfusion

Impact of organ failure and major complications on outcome in acute Type A aortic dissection

Unique characteristics of the type B aortic dissection patients with malperfusion in the Vascular Quality Initiative

Peripheral artery disease is an independent risk factor for higher in-hospital mortality in Stanford type A aortic dissection repair

Analysis of risk factors for postoperative mortality in acute type A aortic dissection patients under different critical levels

Lower-extremity malperfusion syndrome in patients undergoing proximal aortic surgery for acute type A aortic dissection

Surgical outcomes analysis in patients with uncomplicated acute type A aortic dissection: a 13-year institutional experience

Long-Term Outcomes of Surgical Treatment for Acute Type-A Aortic Dissection with Coronary Artery Involvement.

Management for lower limb malperfusion in acute type a aortic dissection patients

Short- and Long-term survival prediction in patients with acute type A aortic dissection undergoing open surgery

Dynamic and Static Vessel Malperfusion as a Consequence of Acute Type B Aortic Dissection