Abstract:Deep Learning (DL) has recently achieved tremendous success. A variety of DL frameworks and platforms play a key role to catalyze such progress. However, the differences in architecture designs and implementations of existing frameworks and platforms bring new challenges for DL software development and deployment. Till now, there is no study on how various mainstream frameworks and platforms influence both DL software development and deployment in practice. To fill this gap, we take the first step towards understanding how the most widely-used DL frameworks and platforms support the DL software development and deployment. We conduct a systematic study on these frameworks and platforms by using two types of DNN architectures and three popular datasets. (1) For development process, we investigate the prediction accuracy under the same runtime training configuration or same model weights/biases. We also study the adversarial robustness of trained models by leveraging the existing adversarial attack techniques. The experimental results show that the computing differences across frameworks could result in an obvious prediction accuracy decline, which should draw the attention of DL developers. (2) For deployment process, we investigate the prediction accuracy and performance (refers to time cost and memory consumption) when the trained models are migrated/quantized from PC to real mobile devices and web browsers. The DL platform study unveils that the migration and quantization still suffer from compatibility and reliability issues. Meanwhile, we find several DL software bugs by using the results as a benchmark. We further validate the results through bug confirmation from stakeholders and industrial positive feedback to highlight the implications of our study. Through our study, we summarize practical guidelines, identify challenges and pinpoint new research directions, such as understanding the characteristics of DL frameworks and platforms, avoiding compatibility and reliability issues, detecting DL software bugs, and reducing time cost and memory consumption towards developing and deploying high quality DL systems effectively.

DeepStellar: Model-based quantitative analysis of stateful deep learning systems.(2019)

There is Limited Correlation Between Coverage and Robustness for Deep Neural Networks

An Empirical Study on Correlation between Coverage and Robustness for Deep Neural Networks

DeepCover: Advancing RNN test coverage and online error prediction using state machine extraction

DeepState

A Comprehensive Overview and Comparative Analysis on Deep Learning Models: CNN, RNN, LSTM, GRU

Deep Neural Network-Embedded Stochastic Nonlinear State-Space Models and Their Applications to Process Monitoring

Survey on Systematic Analysis of Deep Learning Models Compare to Machine Learning

Detecting Defects in Deep Learning Systems: a Survey

An Orchestrated Empirical Study on Deep Learning Frameworks and Platforms

DeepState: Selecting Test Suites to Enhance the Robustness of Recurrent Neural Networks

An Empirical Study Towards Characterizing Deep Learning Development and Deployment Across Different Frameworks and Platforms

A Deep Learning Approach to Analyzing Continuous-Time Systems

DeepSeer: Interactive RNN Explanation and Debugging via State Abstraction

DeepGauge: multi-granularity testing criteria for deep learning systems.

Deep learning in spectral analysis: Modeling and imaging

DeepXplore: Automated Whitebox Testing of Deep Learning Systems

A comprehensive study on challenges in deploying deep learning based software

DeepAuto: A First Step Towards Formal Verification of Deep Learning Systems (S).