The Role of Historical Malaria in Institutions and Contemporary Economic Development
Elizabeth Gooch,Jorge Martinez-Vazquez,Bauyrzhan Yedgenov
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12116-022-09370-z
2022-11-26
Studies in Comparative International Development
Abstract:This research examines the causal impact of institutional quality on economic development from a novel perspective. At the country level, we exploit variation in the natural malaria prevalence in 1900, just before vector-control methods were developed, to instrument for institutional quality using a two-stage least squares instrumental variables framework. Our instrument is a population-weighted average of malaria endemicity estimates for the year 1900 developed by the World Health Organization scientists in the 1960s. We argue that this measure of historical malaria offers more expansive geographic information about the disease environment, and our baseline IV estimates reveal that greater institutional quality causes greater contemporaneous economic growth. Next, we investigate the robustness of these baseline results to alternative explanations, including the role of geography and the role of early colonizers' experiences, as the causal link between the early disease environmental, institutional quality, and contemporary growth. As an additional test of the explanatory power of malaria endemicity in 1900 as an instrumental variable, we replace our instrument for settler mortality and replicate the core results from the seminal study on colonial origins of comparative development by Acemoglu et al. (2001). In summary, we propose that malaria endemicity estimated for 1900 holistically explains the legacy of early disease on institutional quality development and contemporary economic development, thus significantly contributing to the resolution of the geography versus institutions debate.
political science,development studies,international relations