Abstract:BackgroundOur research focuses on mechanisms that promote and stabilize social behavior, fitness consequences of cooperation, and how interactions with conspecifics structure groups and populations. To this end, we studied wild house mice (Mus musculus domesticus) in the laboratory, in semi-natural enclosures and in the field. In 2002, we initiated a project on a free-living population of house mice in a barn near Zurich, Switzerland, where mice were equipped with RFID transponders and were provided with 40 nest boxes for resting and breeding. The population typically comprised between 250 and 400 mice.MethodsTo analyze social group membership, social interactions and social preferences of the mice in our study population over their lifespan, we installed a continuous transponder reading system (AniLoc, FBI Science GmbH, Germany). Mice accessed nest boxes through tunnels equipped with two antennas each. When a mouse implanted with an RFID transponder passed the electromagnetic field of an antenna, its identity was transmitted and registered in real time with AniLoc. Additionally, body weights of mice were automatically registered at eight drinking facilities (Intelliscale, FBI Science GmbH, Germany). Here, a mouse sits on a freely movable platform that connects to a scale registering body weight when drinking, and an antenna around the head of the water bottle registers the drinking individual’s RFID transponder.ResultsThe system enabled continuous remote monitoring of the behavior of a free-living, open population of house mice, when using nest boxes and when drinking. Since such safe places are an important resource for survival and reproduction, time of day, duration and frequency of meetings with conspecifics reveal information about the function of their interactions. Trigger efficiency of antennas was 98.2 %. Mice entered and left the nest boxes with an average speed of 0.03 m/s, which is within the antennas’ detection capacity (detection speed of 1 m/s or 3.6 km/h). The antenna devices documented not only social structuring of our study population but also spatial genetic structuring. The observation that mice lived in rather closed social groups and tended to share nest boxes with relatives highlights the importance of kin selection for the evolution and maintenance of social behavior.ConclusionsWe suggest that such automatic recording of activity, spatial distribution and social interactions is helpful not only in field studies, for a variety of species, but also in captivity or laboratory studies, to answer basic questions in behavioral ecology, population ecology, population genetics, conservation biology, disease ecology, or animal welfare.

Lodge‐building in rodents: relationships with ecological and natural history factors

Nest-building in breeding mice: Impact of macro- and micro-environment

Effects of geographical location and size on the functional properties of harvest mouse Micromys minutus nests in Great Britain

Experimenting with artificial shelters to assist habitat restoration for medium‐sized ground‐dwelling mammals

Host and habitat shape ectoparasite diversity on Mastomys natalensis and Mastomys coucha (Muridae)

A single genetic locus lengthens deer mouse burrows via motor pattern evolution

Nests of the harvest mouse (Micromys minutus) as habitat for invertebrates

Evolutionary lability of food caching behaviour in mammals

A system for automatic recording of social behavior in a free-living wild house mouse population

Machine learning identification of microhabitat features associated with occupancy of artificial nestboxes by hazel dormice Muscardinus avellanarius in a UK woodland site

High Frequency of Apodemus Mice Boosts Inverse Activity Pattern of Bank Voles, Clethrionomys glareolus, through Non-Aggressive Intraguild Competition

Sex and age differences in the preference for materials for the communal nests of sociable weavers Philetairus socius

Variation in forest patch habitat quality for white‐footed mice driven by invasive plants in an urbanizing landscape

Fly on the Wall: Comparing Arthropod Communities between Islands with and without House Mice (Mus musculus)1

Microbiome diversity and zoonotic bacterial pathogen prevalence in Peromyscus mice from agricultural landscapes and synanthropic habitat

Enriched laboratory housing increases sensitivity to social stress in female California mice (Peromyscus californicus)

Every branch in its niche: intraspecific variation in habitat suitability of a widely distributed small mammal, the harvest mouse Micromys minutus

Modelling collective behavior in groups of mice housed under semi-naturalistic conditions

Hibernation nest site selection but not overwinter activity is associated with microclimatic conditions in a hibernating mammal

Microclimate shapes the phylosymbiosis of rodent gut microbiota in Jordan's Great Rift Valley

Ant's Nest as a microenvironment: Distinct Mucoromycota (Fungi) community of the red wood ants' (Formica polyctena) mounds