Principles and pitfalls in coronary vasomotor function testing

Rutger GT Feenstra, Andreas Seitz, Coen KM Boerhout, Laura H Bukkems, Valérie E Stegehuis, Patty JI Teeuwisse, Robbert J de Winter, Udo Sechtem, Jan J Piek, Tim P van de Hoef, Peter Ong, Marcel AM Beijk
2022-02-01
Abstract:BackgroundCoronary vasomotor dysfunction can be diagnosed in a large proportion of patients with angina in the presence of non-obstructive coronary artery disease (ANOCA) using comprehensive protocols for coronary vasomotor function testing (CFT). Although consensus on diagnostic criteria for endotypes of coronary vasomotor dysfunction has been published, consensus on a standardised study testing protocol is lacking.AimsIn this review we provide an overview of the variations in CFT used and discuss the practical principles and pitfalls of CFT.MethodsFor the purposes of this review, we assessed study protocols that evaluate coronary vasomotor response as reported in the literature. We compared these protocols regarding a number of procedural aspects and chose six examples to highlight the differences and uniqueness.ResultsCurrently, numerous protocols co-exist and vary in vascular domains …
What problem does this paper attempt to address?