Abstract:Background Pulsed field ablation (PFA) is a relatively new non-thermal form of ablation employing irreversible cell electroporation as an alternative to radio-frequency ablation. Conventional use of PFA relies on fluoroscopy. Electro-anatomical and voltages mapping (EAM) may potentially provide refinement of PFA via ablation of non-PV targets and accurate localisation of catheter placement. Currently there is limited data on the efficacy of the use of voltages criteria of EAM in conjunction PFA in the treatment of atrial fibrillation. Objective The aim of our study was to determine the effect on atrial arrhythmia recurrence with the use of EAM with PFA in patients requiring atrial fibrillation ablation. Methods This single centre retrospective observational analysis included one hundred patients with symptomatic AF (paroxysmal and persistent) undergoing ablation for the first time. Fifty patients underwent PFA-PVI alone and fifty patients underwent PFA-PVI with EAM. Data were obtained on patient characteristics, outcomes, procedure details and complications up to one year. A blanking period of three months was used post-ablation. For rhythm monitoring we utilised ECGs and holters at three, six, nine and twelve months and twenty-four hour holter monitoring at six and nine months. We also used remote monitoring in between these periods to record any symptomatic episodes atrial arrhythmias. Results Baseline patient characteristics are represented in Table 1. Despite having no significant difference in category of AF between groups (Paroxysmal, persistent, longstanding persistent) the mapping group were significantly older (68.2 years ± 10.2 vs 60.1 ± 11.11; p=0.01), longer duration of documented atrial fibrillation (45.9 ± 50 vs 28.6 ± 38 months; p=0.038), higher risk for CV events with CHA2DS2-VASc score (2.2 ± 1.5 vs 1.42 ± 1.2; p=0.04), however, procedure times were greater in the PVI and mapping group (72.8 ± 6.2 vs 41.1 ± 17 minutes; p=0.03). Successful PVI was achieved acutely in all patients upon voltage guided mapping validation and most importantly 1 year follow up revealed comparable outcome in both groups (Fig 1). Conclusion Patients who underwent PFA with mapping were older, greater co-morbidity and longer duration of AF burden. Yet, the addition of EAM with PFA did demonstrate equivalent achievement of sinus rhythm and was relatively high as higher than 80 % at one year follow up. This study may suggest a preference to using EAM in patients who may be deemed to be older and have a greater co-morbidity. It emerges as a great hope to safer approach and successful intervention to reduce AF burden.mapping vs PVI onlyGraph showing one year follow up

Procedural efficiency is enhanced combining the pentaspline pulsed field ablation catheter with three-dimensional electroanatomical mapping system for pulmonary vein isolation

Role of 3D-electro-anatomical mapping on procedural characteristics and outcomes in pulsed-field ablation for atrial fibrillation

Initial Real-World Experiences of Pulmonary Vein Isolation and Ablation of Non-Pulmonary Vein Sites Using a Novel Circular Array Pulsed Field Ablation Catheter

Pulsed-field ablation for atrial fibrillation without the use of fluoroscopy

Pulsed-field ablation-based pulmonary vein isolation: acute safety, efficacy and short-term follow-up in a multi-center real world scenario

First-in-human clinical series of a novel conformable large-lattice pulsed field ablation catheter for pulmonary vein isolation

Pulsed field ablation for pulmonary vein isolation in the treatment of atrial fibrillation

Safety and effectiveness of pulsed field ablation for pulmonary vein isolation in atrial fibrillation patients: a single centre experience

A zero‐exchange approach for left atrial access in pulmonary vein isolation with pulsed field ablation

Pulsed field ablation using additional mapping and substrate modification to treat atrial fibrillation - one year outcome comparison

Feasibility study on atrial fibrillation ablation with pulsed field ablation and concomitant occlusion of the left atrial appendage

Pulsed Field Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation: A Novel Technology for Safer and Faster Ablation

Efficacy and safety of pulsed field ablation compared to cryoballoon ablation in the treatment of atrial fibrillation: a meta-analysis

Next-generation atrial fibrillation ablation: clinical performance of pulsed-field ablation and very high-power short-duration radiofrequency

Left atrial posterior wall isolation during catheter ablation with the pulsed field ablation in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation

Sequential Isolation of Persistent Left Superior Vena Cava and Right Superior Vena Cava Using Pulsed-field Ablation with a Pentaspline Catheter for Recurrent Persistent Atrial Fibrillation

Point-by-Point Pulsed Field Ablation Using a Multimodality Generator and a Contact Force-Sensing Ablation Catheter: Comparison With Radiofrequency Ablation in a Remapped Chronic Swine Heart

Meta-analysis of Pulsed Field Ablation Versus Thermal Ablation for Pulmonary Vein Isolation in AF: A Broad Overview Focusing on Efficacy, Safety and Outcomes

VARIPULSE: A step-by-step guide to pulmonary vein isolation

Pulsed field ablation technology for pulmonary vein and left atrial posterior wall isolation in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation

Pulsed electric field, cryoballoon, and radiofrequency for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation ablation: a propensity score-matched comparison