Light exposure of tetra‐cationic porphyrins containing peripheral Pd(II)‐bipyridyl complexes and the induced effects on purified DNA molecule, fibroblast and melanoma cell lines

Luana B. Trentin,Altevir R. Viana,Sophia Iwersen,Bernardo A. Iglesias,Otávio A. Chaves,André P. Schuch
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/php.14017
2024-08-31
Photochemistry and Photobiology
Abstract:The Pd(II) porphyrins (3‐PdTPyP and 4‐PdTPyP) interact with DNA and induce the formation of DNA lesions under white light exposure, mainly oxidized purines. These porphyrins also demonstrated specific phototoxic activity at low concentrations in A375 and L929 melanoma cell lines. The white light exposure of the A375 cell line with 3‐PdTPyP was 16.6‐fold more cytotoxic than the dark condition. On the other hand, 4‐PdTPyP was 8.7‐fold more cytotoxic to the B16‐F10 cell line under white light exposure than in the dark. These Pd(II) porphyrins present potential application for future studies focused on the photodynamic therapy of skin cancer. Photodynamic therapy (PDT) combines a light source, oxygen, and a photosensitizer (PS) to generate reactive oxygen species (ROS) for treating diseases. In this study, we evaluated two meso‐tetra‐pyridyl porphyrins with [Pd(bpy)Cl]+, namely 3‐PdTPyP and 4‐PdTPyP, as PS for PDT application. DNA interaction was assessed by spectroscopic measurements (UV–Vis and fluorescence emission), viscosity analysis, and molecular docking simulations. The results indicate that Pd(II)‐porphyrins do not intercalate into DNA, suggesting that the minor groove is the primary interaction site, mainly through van der Waals forces. These metalloporphyrins effectively induced nitrogenous bases oxidation, particularly in purines, after white light irradiation. The induced DNA lesions were able to inactivate plasmid DNA metabolism (DNA replication and transcription) in a bacterial model. 3‐PdTPyP and 4‐PdTPyP significantly decreased the viability of treated melanoma cell lines (A375 and B16‐F10), demonstrating that melanoma cell lines were more sensitive to these Pd(II)‐porphyrins than the fibroblast cell line (L929). Moreover, 3‐PdTPyP was more photototoxic to A375 cells (IC50 = 0.43 μM), whereas 4‐PdTPyP was more photototoxic to B16‐F10 cells (IC50 = 0.51 μM). These findings suggest that these porphyrins are promising PS for future PDT research focused on skin cancer.
biochemistry & molecular biology,biophysics
What problem does this paper attempt to address?