Abstract:Spring phenology of temperate ecosystems is highly sensitive to climate change, generating various impacts on many important terrestrial surface biophysical processes. Although various prognostic models relying on environmental variables of temperature and photoperiod have been developed for spring phenology, comprehensive ecosystem-scale evaluations over large landscapes and long-time periods remain lacking. Further, environmental variables other than temperature and photoperiod might also importantly constrain spring phenology modelling but remain under-investigation. To address these issues, we leveraged around 20-years datasets of environmental variables (from Daymet and GLDAS products) and the spring phenology metric (i.e., the greenup date) respectively derived from MODIS and PhenoCams across 108 sites in the Northern and Eastern United States. We firstly cross-compared MODIS-derived greenup date with official PhenoCams product with high accuracy ( R 2 = 0.70). Then, we evaluated the three prognostic models (i.e., Growing Degree Date (GDD), Sequential (SEQ) and optimality-based (OPT)) with MODIS-derived spring phenology, assessed the model residuals and their associations with soil moisture, rainfall, and solar radiation, and revised the two photoperiod-relevant models (SEQ, OPT) by replacing the daylength variable with solar radiation, which was found to contribute the most to model residuals. We found that 1) all models demonstrated good capability in characterizing spring phenology, with OPT performing the best (RMSE = 8.04 ± 5.05 days), followed by SEQ (RMSE = 10.57 ± 7.77 days) and GDD (RMSE = 10.84 ± 8.42 days), 2) all models displayed high model residuals showing tight correlation with solar radiation ( r = 0.45–0.75), and 3) the revised models that included solar radiation significantly performed better with an RMSE reduction by 22.08%. Such results are likely because solar radiation better constrains early growing season plant photosynthesis than photoperiod, supporting the hypothesis of spring phenology as an adaptive strategy to maximize photosynthetic carbon gain (approximated by solar radiation) while minimizing frost damage risk (captured by temperature). Collectively, our study reveals the underappreciated importance of solar radiation in constraining spring phenology of temperate ecosystems, and suggests ways to improve spring phenology modelling and other phenology-related ecological processes.

Duration and variability of spring green‐up mediate population consequences of climate change

Migratory strategy drives species-level variation in bird sensitivity to vegetation green-up

Increasing phenological asynchrony between spring green-up and arrival of migratory birds

Autumn bird migration phenology: A potpourri of wind, precipitation and temperature effects

A global synthesis of animal phenological responses to climate change

Spatial variation in spring arrival patterns of Afro‐Palaearctic bird migration across Europe

Chasing and surfing seasonal waves: Avian migration through the US tracks land surface phenology in fall, but not spring

Consistent delay in recent timing of passerine autumn migration

How interacting anthropogenic pressures alter the plasticity of breeding time in two common songbirds

Beyond gradual warming: extreme weather events alter flower phenology of European grassland and heath species

Spatially heterogeneous shifts in vegetation phenology induced by climate change threaten the integrity of the avian migration network

Recent Spring Phenology Shifts in Western Central Europe Based on Multiscale Observations

The underappreciated importance of solar radiation in constraining spring phenology of temperate ecosystems in the Northern and Eastern United States

Phenological variation in biotic interactions shapes population dynamics and distribution in a range-shifting insect herbivore

Earlier and more uniform spring green-up linked to lower insect richness and biomass in temperate forests

Population responses of bird populations to climate change on two continents vary with species’ ecological traits but not with direction of change in climate suitability

Strength of seasonality and type of migratory cue determine the fitness consequences of changing phenology for migratory animals

Seasonal Differences in Relationships Between Changes in Spring Phenology and Dynamics of Carbon Cycle in Grasslands

Opportunistic plant observations reveal spatial and temporal gradients in phenology

Shifts in migration phenology under climate change: temperature vs. abundance effects in birds

Spatial-temporal phenological asynchrony induced by climate change threatens the integrity of the avian migration network