The six success factors for REIT market development: lessons for China?
David Parker
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JPIF-04-2019-100
2019-10-07
Journal of Property Investment and Finance
Abstract:The recently published Routledge REITs Research Handbook , which I had the pleasure of editing ( Parker, 2018 ), included six chapters on REITs in different regions of the world, each written by an expert author with an intimate knowledge of the region. Rather than the usual, trite comparative analysis of market capitalisation, distribution requirements, minimum holding levels, tax concessions and so forth, the authors surveyed the development of REITs in their region with a focus on the structural and market features that differed between regions. Ascending by helicopter above the text of each of the six chapters permits a holistic view that allows some common themes and features of six decades of international REIT evolution to be identified and classified as the six success factors for REIT market development: start diversified; avoid property company domination; focus on growth catalysts; follow the trend for leverage; optimise government support; and do not bother without tax breaks. With China being potentially the world's largest emerging REIT market, could the six success factors offer lessons for China? The common approach around the world appears to be for an REIT industry to start with diversified REITs and then see the emergence of sector-specific REITs later, with this global trend starting in North America ( Case, 2018 ). The USA started with diversified REITs then broadened into industrial, retail and office REITs before broadening further into infrastructure, data centre and timberland REITs. Similarly, Canada started with diversified REITs and retail REITs before broadening into residential and office REITs and then broadening further into health care, industrial and hotel REITs. Following the pattern, Mexico started with diversified and industrial REITs before broadening into hotel and retail REITs. For those regions where a significant property company and unlisted fund market already exists, an evolving REIT market may forgo the initial diversified portfolio phase and move straight into sector-specific REITs, as happened in the UK ( Moss, 2018 ). There is an apparent commonality around the world that, where a jurisdiction has a well-established property company or fideicomiso market, an REIT market may have difficulty gaining traction and becoming established. Hong Kong had a long-standing and well-understood property company market which, with the absence of tax transparency, provided structural challenges for the development of a REIT market ( Ooi and Wong, 2018 ). Similarly, across Latin America, recent legislative and regulatory changes in various countries have facilitated a clearer regulatory definition of investment funds as a form of indirect vehicle based on the popular, long standing and well recognised legal entity, the fideicomiso, which emerging REITs are finding hard to displace. Indeed, in Uruguay, REITs do not yet exist with the Real Estate Finance Fideicomiso effectively fulfilling the role ( Taltavull de la Paz et al. , 2018 ). Interestingly, again, the UK has evolved in a contrarian manner where the existing significant property company and unlisted fund market did not preclude the development of an REIT market, though transitional provisions assisted ( Moss, 2018 ). Similar transitional provisions to encourage the transformation of property companies into REITs also operated successfully in Singapore and facilitated the success of the emerging REIT sector ( Liow and Yuting, 2018 ). A series of common catalysts of REIT market growth may be identified around the world. A regular contributor to REIT market growth is a collapse in the direct property market which generates a supply of suitable stock as occurred in Canada ( Case, 2018 ) and the USA in the early 1900s ( Case, 2018 ). Availability of capital may also be a catalyst such as in Poland ( Moss, 2018 ) and the USA after the dotcom crash of the early 2000s ( Case, 2018 ). Alternatively, the catalyst may be good luck and fortunate timing as occurred in the Spanish REIT market where institutions were structurally underweight equities due to the GFC and a debt-fuelled commercial property collapse preceded the introduction of REIT legislation ( Moss, 2018 ). Leverage in REITs changed dramatically following the GFC with existing REITs around the world delivering and the acceptable level of debt plummeting. Since the GFC, various countries have introduced leverage constraints into their REIT markets including Spain ( Moss, 2018 ) and Thailand limiting leverage to 60 percent for an REIT with an investment grade rating ( Liow and Yuting, 2018 ). Some countries have gone further, with South Africa introducing 60 percent leverage, a requirement for a risk monitoring commi -Abstract Truncated-