Learning and Problem Solving Strategies of ESL Students
Anna Uhl Chamot,Marsha Dale,J. Michael O'Malley,George A. Spanos
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15235882.1992.10162635
1992-07-01
Bilingual Research Journal
Abstract:The mathematics problem solving approaches of a group of elementary and secondary ESL students were investigated through a performance assessment accompanied by think-aloud procedures. Students were enrolled in ESL mathematics classes in a Title VII project implementing the Cognitive Academic Learning Approach (CALLA). In this approach, curriculum content is used to develop academic language and learning strategies are taught explicitly to increase students' metacognitive awareness and to facilitate their learning of both content and language. Participating teachers were identified either as high implementation teachers (extensive involvement in staff development and other project activities) or low implementation teachers (limited involvement in project activities). The study was designed to identify learning and problem solving strategies of students at high, average and low mathematics achievement levels, and to compare strategic approaches of students in high implementation and low implementation classrooms. The results indicated that significantly more students in high implementation classrooms were able to solve the problem correctly than were students in low implementation classrooms. As expected, students rated high in math performance also performed significantly better on finding the correct problem solution. Of greater interest was the finding that there were no differences in the actual number of problem solving steps used by students in the two implementation levels, but that significant differences for high implementation classrooms were found for correct sequence of problem solving steps, which has been featured in instruction in the high implementation classrooms. This seemed to indicate that explicit instruction in a problem solving sequential procedure is helpful for ESL students. In addition, students in high implementation classrooms used significandy more metacognitive strategies than students in low implementation classrooms. High math ability students used the most metacognitive strategies in all types of classrooms. with average math ability students using fewer metacognitive strategies and low math ability students using the fewest metacognitive strategies. This finding seemed to indicate that students who were the highest achievers in mathematics and who received information about and practice in metacognitive strategies (such as planning, monitoring, and evaluating one's own learning) were better able to regulate their learning than less able math students or students in low implementation classrooms. Problems identified in the study were that even in high implementation classrooms, lower achieving students did not use the correct sequence of problem solving steps. Reasons could be attributed to differences in mathematics ability, differences in linguistic competence (since the task involved reading and understand a word problem), and/or amount of prior knowledge about learning and problem solving strategies. More research is needed to clarify these and other problems related to mathematics achievement of ESL students.
English Else