Defect-Rich Hierarchical Porous UiO-66(Zr) for Tunable Phosphate Removal
Mohua Li,Yanbiao Liu,Fang Li,Chensi Shen,Yusuf Valentino Kaneti,Yusuke Yamauchi,Brian Yuliarto,Bo Chen,Chong-Chen Wang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.1c01723
2021-09-23
Abstract:The introduction of defects into hierarchical porous metal–organic frameworks (HP-MOFs) is of vital significance to boost their adsorption performance. Herein, an advanced template-assisted strategy has been developed to fine-tune the phosphate adsorption performance of HP-MOFs by dictating the type and number of defects in HP-UiO-66(Zr). To achieve this, monocarboxylic acids of varying chain lengths have been employed as template molecules to fabricate an array of defect-rich HP-UiO-66(Zr) derivatives following removal of the template. The as-prepared HP-UiO-66(Zr) exhibits a higher sorption capacity and faster sorption rate compared to the pristine UiO-66(Zr). Particularly, the octanoic acid-modulated UiO-66(Zr) exhibits a high adsorption capacity of 186.6 mg P/g and an intraparticle diffusion rate of 6.19 mg/g·min0.5, which are 4.8 times and 1.9 times higher than those of pristine UiO-66(Zr), respectively. The results reveal that defect sites play a critical role in boosting the phosphate uptake performance, which is further confirmed by various advanced characterizations. Density functional theory (DFT) calculations reveal the important role of defects in not only providing additional sorption sites but also reducing the sorption energy between HP-UiO-66(Zr) and phosphate. In addition, the hierarchical pores in HP-UiO-66(Zr) can accelerate the phosphate diffusion toward the active sorption sites. This work presents a promising route to tailor the adsorption performance of MOF-based adsorbents via defect engineering.The Supporting Information is available free of charge at https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.est.1c01723.(Section S1) Experimental section; (Sections S2 and S3) characterizations, (Section S4) theoretical calculations; (Tables S1–S12) quality of simulated water, BET/BJH results, maximum adsorption capacity for phosphate, comparison of the phosphate adsorption capacity, phosphate adsorption kinetics, elemental mass percentage, and EXAFS fitting parameters; and (Figures S1–S26) SEM images, PXRD patterns, 1H/NMR spectra, zeta potential curves, N2 adsorption–desorption isotherms, Zr dissolution, TEM image, XPS spectra, SEM-EDS spectra, DFT calculation models, stability, repeatability, pH, and EXAFS spectrum of HP-UiO-66(Zr)-OA (PDF)This article has not yet been cited by other publications.
environmental sciences,engineering, environmental