Abstract:Background Treatment adherence is crucial for outcome improvement. Still up to 50% of patients interrupt e.g. endocrine treatment or other effective treatment choices due to side effects or miscommunication. Reasons may include limited time spent for patient information in daily routine and the intrinsic barriers to frankly tell the truth to the attending physicians. Therefore, a patient initiated survey has been compiled to comprehensively address all clinical, diagnostic and critical aspects of importance for patients by decentral data capture from patients at home via smart devices in a pseudonymized & interactive fashion to refocus on challenges regarding patients needs, fears and wishes to support evidence based statistical analysis of Real World Data. Materials and Methods Establishing a cloud-based IT Platform enabling nationwide, decentral data entry using Climedo clinical trial software tools without the need of any commercial app utilities and therefore obeying GDPR conform standards to create an interconnected online platform integrating 36 interconnected surveys comprising >1.200 singular questions has been set up between 2020 and 2022 based on patients content elaboration & wishes. The questionnaires address all Real World experiences e.g. at initial diagnosis, during primary treatment and all subsequent lines as well as side effect management with complementary medicine and follow up care realities. After 100 patients a preplanned statistical analysis has been performed to evaluate the feasibility of the patient oriented ePRO approach and demonstrate relevance of proof-of-concept results before entering international trial expansion. Descriptive analysis by Excel as well as Correlation analysis; Chi square and Partitioning tests using the SAS JMP® 9.0.0 software were performed. Results Despite in depth complexity > 85% of patients completed the whole survey. Age distribution of the pilot cohort revealed comparably younger patient age (28% between 30-39 years, 40% between 40-49 years, 24% between 50-59 and 10% being above 60 years) and dominance of Triple Negative Patients (~39%) participating the online survey in the pilot cohort. 97% of patients were treated in certified breast centers (50% in larger centers of bigger towns,15% in central clinics, 23% in university sites, 5% in local hospitals and 7% at office based doctors). Interestingly, 25% of patients did not or only partially understand their diagnosis and upcoming treatment. Time spent for communicating initial breast cancer diagnosis was less than 10 minutes for 25% of patients, while 13% did not remember. Exclusively one treatment option was discussed with 86% of patients. 78% have been informed about their initial breast cancer diagnosis in personal meetings, while 21% were informed by phone calls. 37% of patients had been informed about their patient rights. At preplanned interim analysis 38% of patients were lymphnode positive and 6% metastasized at initial diagnosis. 56% of patients were satisfied with their guideline conform follow-up-care, while 42% did pay for additional follow up care on their own. 85% of patients wished to have a risk-adopted, more individualized follow-up care. Conclusion Despite complexity and lengthiness > 85% of patients did complete the survey. There is an apparent need to have more time for initial confrontation with diagnosis and treatment options. Patients are frequently not informed about alternative treatment options as well as patient rights. Patients frequently feel under pressure in their life threatening situation and suffer substantial lack of information as well as appropriate personal communication. Patient centricity should focus on elaborated communication and information systems that support treatment decision acceptance and adherence. Further details analysis will become available in upcoming subanalysis of the Breast BRIDGister platform survey. Citation Format: Cornelia Stuewe, Ralph Wirtz, Christa Gress, Lena Schmidt, Veronika Schweighart, Sebastian Eidt, Claudia Schumacher, Julia Habraschka, Heidi Lehmann, Katrin Schuere. Patient initiated centricity towards improved communication, side effect management and follow-up care by Real World Evidence Survey from patients for patients – Preview of the Breast BRIDGister Platform [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2023 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2023 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(9 Suppl) nr PO4-16-12.

Awareness, use and perception of patient versions of clinical practice guidelines – a national cross-sectional survey among patients with a cancer diagnosis and healthcare providers

Use, applicability, and dissemination of patient versions of clinical practice guidelines in oncology in Germany: a qualitative interview study with healthcare providers

Recommendations to improve use and dissemination of patient versions of oncological clinical practice guidelines in Germany: results of a multi-stakeholder workshop

Barriers and facilitators in developing patient versions of clinical practice guidelines - qualitative interviews on experiences of international guideline producers

Awareness and understanding of cancer immunotherapy in Europe

What do patients and the public know about clinical practice guidelines and what do they want from them? A qualitative study

Finding a needle in a haystack: The identification of clinical practice guidelines for psychosocial oncology through an environmental scan of the academic and gray literature

Cancer patient utilisation of psychological care in Germany: The role of attitudes towards seeking help

Barriers and facilitators of adherence to clinical practice guidelines in Germany—A systematic review

Psycho-Oncological Self-Help Groups in Bavaria: The Current Situation and Suggestions for Improvement

Awareness, offer, and use of psychosocial services by breast cancer survivors in Germany: a prospective multi-centre study

Benchmarking palliative care practices in neurooncology: a german perspective

Cross-sectoral cancer care: views from patients and health care professionals regarding a personal electronic health record

Abstract PO4-16-12: Patient initiated centricity towards improved communication, side effect management and follow-up care by Real World Evidence Survey from patients for patients – Preview of the Breast BRIDGister Platform

Development and psychometric validation of a patient safety assessment tool in German Radiation Oncology: the PaSaGeRO Study protocol

Patient perceptions of their decision to undergo palliative chemotherapy in the Edinburgh Cancer Centre

Acceptability and Feasibility of a Guided Biopsychosocial Online Intervention for Cancer Patients Undergoing Chemotherapy

Cancer risk communication, predictive testing and management in France, Germany, the Netherlands and the UK: general practitioners' and breast surgeons' current practice and preferred practice responsibilities

How do guideline developers identify, incorporate and report patient preferences? An international cross-sectional survey

"Uninformed consent" in clinical trials with cancer patients: A qualitative analysis of patients' and support persons' communication experiences and needs

Engaging cancer patients in clinical practice guideline development: a pilot study