Regenerative positive psychology: A call to reorient wellbeing science to meet the realities of our world

Michael F. Steger a Department of Psychology,Center for Meaning and Purpose,Colorado State University,Fort Collins,USAb Optentia Research Programme,North-West University,Vanderbijlpark,South Africa
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2024.2365259
2024-06-13
The Journal of Positive Psychology
Abstract:Positive psychology has had an impressive first 25 years. However, it and related wellbeing sciences are at risk of being rendered futile at a time of staggering crises across psychological, social, political, and environmental domains. This paper is a call for a new science of wellbeing, a Regenerative Positive Psychology, that reorients the field toward protecting and expanding the growth and health of the life-sustaining systems necessary for our wellbeing. This paper asks whether life has improved significantly since the launch of positive psychology, appraises the field's disproportionate emphasis on individual wellbeing, describes regenerative approaches in other fields, and proposes Three Pillars for a Regenerative Positive Psychology that is better equipped to take on the daunting challenges ahead. As fields rooted in strengths, hope, and purpose, positive psychology together with wellbeing sciences are ideally suited to take greater leadership in facing the world's crises and building more positive futures for all.
psychology, multidisciplinary
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
This paper aims to explore the effectiveness and limitations of the field of Positive Psychology (PP) in the face of global psychological, social, political, and environmental crises, and proposes the development of a new form of positive psychology—Regenerative Positive Psychology (RPP)—to better address the challenges of the current world. Author Michael F. Steger points out that although significant achievements have been made in the first 25 years of the development of positive psychology, the current world is facing various unprecedented crises, such as climate change and environmental degradation. These crises threaten the well-being of humans and other life forms. Therefore, the existing positive psychology and its related well-being sciences may be insufficient to address these challenges, necessitating a fundamental shift. The main arguments of the paper are as follows: 1. **Assessing the Impact of Positive Psychology**: By analyzing global data to evaluate changes in life satisfaction, happiness, mental health, and other aspects since the inception of positive psychology. The results show that although some indicators have improved, overall changes are minimal or even deteriorated in some areas. 2. **Limitations of Positive Psychology**: Positive psychology overly focuses on individual-level well-being research while neglecting systemic factors such as democratic institutions, social trust, gender equality, and wealth distribution, which are crucial for enhancing overall well-being. 3. **Proposing the Concept of Regenerative Positive Psychology**: In light of the current crises, the author calls for the establishment of regenerative positive psychology, a new disciplinary direction that more comprehensively considers the interaction between ecosystem health and individual well-being. The goal of RPP is to protect and support the growth and health of systems necessary for sustaining life. 4. **Three Pillars of Regenerative Positive Psychology**: The author proposes three core elements of RPP, but the specific content is not detailed in the provided summary. In conclusion, the paper emphasizes the limitations of current positive psychology in the face of global crises and calls for more systematic research to promote the co-prosperity of humans and nature.