Abstract:While carbon pricing is widely seen as a crucial element of climate policy and has been implemented in many countries, it also has met with strong resistance. We provide a comprehensive overview of public perceptions of the fairness of carbon pricing and how these affect policy acceptability. To this end, we review evidence from empirical studies on how individuals judge personal, distributional and procedural aspects of carbon taxes and cap-and-trade. In addition, we examine preferences for particular redistributive and other uses of revenues generated by carbon pricing and their role in instrument acceptability. Our results indicate a high concern over distributional effects, particularly in relation to policy impacts on poor people, in turn reducing policy acceptability. In addition, people show little trust in the capacities of governments to put the revenues of carbon pricing to good use. Somewhat surprisingly, most studies do not indicate clear public preferences for using revenues to ensure fairer policy outcomes, notably by reducing its regressive effects. Instead, many people prefer using revenues for 'environmental projects' of various kinds. We end by providing recommendations for improving public acceptability of carbon pricing. One suggestion to increase policy acceptability is combining the redistribution of revenue to vulnerable groups with the funding for environmental projects, such as on renewable energy.Key policy insights If people perceive carbon pricing instruments as fair, this increases policy acceptability and support.People's satisfaction with information provided by the government about the policy instrument increases acceptability.While people express high concern over uneven distribution of the policy burden, they often prefer using carbon pricing revenues for environmental projects instead of compensation for inequitable outcomes.Recent studies find that people's preferences shift to using revenues for making policy fairer if they better understand the functioning of carbon pricing, notably that relatively high prices of CO2-intensive goods and services reduce their consumption.Combining the redistribution of revenue to support both vulnerable groups and environmental projects, such as on renewable energy, seems to most increase policy acceptability.

Distributive justice concerns when combating air pollution: The joint modelling of attitudes and preferences

Income Elasticity of Willingness to Pay for Better Air Quality

Recency and projection biases in air quality valuation by Chinese residents.

Assessing individual environmental capital and pro-climate behaviour: A residential sector choice experiment on heating investment preferences

Citizens' perceptions regarding air pollution

A benefit allocation model for the joint prevention and control of air pollution in China: In view of environmental justice

Projection Bias in Decision-Making: Daily Air Pollution and Willingness to Pay for Better Air Quality

The effects of fair allocation principles on energy system model designs

Do Attitudes Toward Air Pollution Influence Climate Change Perception? Evidence from Online Customers in China

Reflection on the joint prevention and control of air pollution from the perspective of environmental justice-insights from a two-stage dynamic game model

Perceived fairness and public acceptability of carbon pricing: a review of the literature

Tackling (Not Only) Air Pollution: Cross-sectional Tensions behind State-led Energy Retrofit Program in Poland

Bipartite Interference and Air Pollution Transport: Estimating Health Effects of Power Plant Interventions

How Do We Move towards a Greener and Socially Equitable Future? Identifying the Trade-Offs of Accepted CO2 Pricing Revenues in Germany

Who pays for clean air, and why?: Analyzing the impact of resource, planned behavior, and government/policy factors on the multidimensional willingness to pay for reducing the particulate matter

Air Pollution, Environmental Protection Tax and Well-Being

Haze Attitudes and the Willingness to Pay for Haze Improvement: Evidence from Four Cities in Shandong Province, China

Do Preferences to Reduce Health Risks Related to Air Pollution Depend on Illness Type? Evidence from a Choice Experiment in Beijing, China

Willingness to Pay to Reduce Health Risks Related to Air Quality: Evidence from a Choice Experiment Survey in Beijing

Valuing urban air quality: a hedonic price analysis in Beijing, China

Do consumers try to solve the air pollution problem themselves? the effects of air pollution on purchase of hybrid and electric cars