Egg consumption and risk of coronary artery disease, potential amplification by high genetic susceptibility: a prospective cohort study

Xue Xia,Fangchao Liu,Keyong Huang,Shufeng Chen,Jianxin Li,Jie Cao,Xueli Yang,Xiaoqing Liu,Chong Shen,Ling Yu,Yingxin Zhao,Liancheng Zhao,Ying Li,Dongsheng Hu,Jiangfeng Huang,Xiangfeng Lu,Dongfeng Gu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajcnut.2023.06.009
2023-08-01
Abstract:Background Remarkable heterogeneity has been observed among population-based studies on egg consumption and risk of coronary artery disease (CAD). Whether genetic susceptibility serves as a potential explanation for this inconsistency remains unknown. Objectives We performed a prospective cohort study to investigate the association of egg consumption with incident CAD at different genetic susceptibilities. Methods We included 34,111 participants without CAD at baseline from the project of Prediction for Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease Risk in China. Egg consumption was assessed with food frequency questionnaires. Genetic susceptibility was quantified by a predefined polygenic risk score (PRS) with 540 genetic variants. The hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence interval (95% CI) of incident CAD associated with egg consumption and PRS were estimated using the Cox proportional hazards models. Results Over a median 11.7 y of follow-up, 1,128 incident cases of CAD were recorded. Both higher egg consumption and increased PRS were related to higher risk of CAD. When stratified by genetic risk, each increment of 3 eggs/wk was associated with a 5% higher risk of CAD for participants at low to intermediate genetic risk (HR: 1.05; 95% CI: 1.01, 1.09), whereas risk increased to HR 1.10 (95% CI: 1.05, 1.16) for those at high genetic risk; a significant synergistic interaction was also indicated at both multiplicative (P interaction = 0.007) and additive (relative excess risk: 0.73; 95% CI: 0.24, 1.22) scales. When the joint effect was examined, in comparison with those at low to intermediate genetic risk and consuming <1 egg/wk, the HR (95% CI) was 2.95 (2.41, 3.62) for participants with high genetic risk and consumption of ≥10 eggs/wk, and the corresponding standardized 10-y CAD rates increased from 1.37% to 4.24%. Conclusions Genetic predisposition may synergistically interact with egg consumption in relation to increased CAD risk. PRS-stratified recommendations on egg consumption may help formulate personalized nutrition policies.
nutrition & dietetics
What problem does this paper attempt to address?