Abstract:The present agrochemical safety evaluation paradigm is long-standing and anchored in well-established testing and evaluation procedures. However, it does not meet the present-day challenges of rapidly growing populations, food insecurity, and pressures from climate change. To transform the current framework and apply modern evaluation strategies that better support sustainable agriculture, the Health and Environmental Sciences Institute (HESI) assembled a technical committee to reframe the safety evaluation of crop-protection products. The committee is composed of international experts from regulatory agencies, academia, industry and nongovernmental organizations. Their mission is to establish a framework that supports the development of fit-for-purpose agrochemical safety evaluation that is applicable to changing global, as well as local needs and regulatory decisions, and incorporates relevant evolving science. This will be accomplished through the integration of state-of-the-art scientific methods, technologies and data sources, to inform safety and risk decisions, and adapt them to evolving local and global needs. The project team will use a systems-thinking approach to develop the tools that will implement a problem formulation and exposure driven approach to create sustainable, safe and effective crop protection products, and reduce, replace and refine animal studies with fit-for-purpose assays. A new approach necessarily will integrate the most modern tools and latest advances in chemical testing methods to guarantee the robust human and environmental safety and risk assessment of agrochemicals. This article summarizes the challenges associated with the modernization of agrochemical safety evaluation, proposes a potential roadmap, and seeks input and engagement from the broader community to advance this effort. © 2022 Health and Environmental Sciences Institute (HESI). Pest Management Science published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Society of Chemical Industry.

Procedure excellence: Changing paradigms to enable human reliability

One Procedure Change Process, Two Interpretations: A Qualitative Exploration of Differences in User and Administrative Perceptions

Proactive Process Safety Management - Key to the Prevention of Incidents in Industry

An Exploratory Study of Applying a Scrum Development Process for Safety-Critical Systems

A Process-Based Standardization of an Intraoperative Escalation Protocol in Anesthesiology

Transforming the evaluation of agrochemicals

Improving process safety culture through developing and maintaining the sense of vulnerability at all levels in the organization

Understanding safety engineering practice: Comparing safety engineering practice as desired, as required, and as observed

Using Big Data to Improve Safety Performance: an Application of Process Mining to Enhance Data Visualisation.

An application of automated operating procedure synthesis in the nuclear industry

Approaches to Incorporating Green Chemistry and Safety into Laboratory Culture

Design for safety: A cognitive engineering approach to the control and management of nuclear power plants

Heart—A Proposed Method for Achieving High Reliability in Process Operation by Means of Human Factors Engineering Technology

Process safety education and training academic education as a foundation for other process safety initiatives on education

Weaving Agility in Safety-Critical Software Development for Aerospace: From Concerns to Opportunities

Analysing an Industrial Safety Process Through Process Mining: A Case Study

University engagement to improve safety education

Near-miss incident management in the chemical process industry

Safety education 4.0 – A critical review and a response to the process industry 4.0 need in chemical engineering curriculum

Agile Process Consultation -- An Applied Psychology Approach to Agility

Improving the development of event-driven control systems in the batch processing industry. A case study