Abstract:We experimentally evaluate the worker-proposing deferred acceptance mechanism (DA) in matching markets between workers and firms. Specifically, we ask how sequencing decisions and the strategy of the receivers' side of the matching market affect the proposers' side strategy of submitting preferences. As observed in entry-level labor markets, firms do not want workers to reject their job offers. We capture this tendency among firms through the skipping-down strategy they employ after learning workers' submitted rank-order lists, in which a firm prioritizes workers who give it a higher ranking. We conduct an experiment consisting of two treatments of DA where human subjects play the role of workers. Treatments differ in the strategy of automated firms: the truth-telling or the skipping-down strategy. The experiment confirms that the treatment affects workers' preference formation. The degree of stability is lower when firms follow the skipping-down strategy. Moreover, across treatments, we show that most untruthful rank-ordered lists submitted by workers can be explained by a new pattern of behavior called the compromise strategy , which has been reported in the individual decision-making context; that is, if there is an extreme option, workers will tend to prefer the in-between option.

Market Design with Deferred Acceptance: A Recipe for Policymaking

From Boston to Shanghai to Deferred Acceptance: Theory and Experiments on a Family of School Choice Mechanisms

Improving the Deferred Acceptance with Minimal Compromise

School Choice with Consent: An Experiment

Constrained School Choice with Incomplete Information

Choice and Market Design

An experimental study on strategic preference formation in two-sided matching markets

Multi-District School Choice: Playing on Several Fields

Trade-offs in School Choice: Comparing Deferred Acceptance, the Naive and the Classic Boston Mechanism

Post-Match Error Mitigation for Deferred Acceptance

Adaptive Priority Mechanisms

Stable Matching with Contingent Priorities

School Choice with Multiple Priorities

Dynamic Reserves in Matching Markets

Nonstandard Choice In Matching Markets

Two-Sided Random Matching Markets: Ex-Ante Equivalence of the Deferred Acceptance Procedures

Preference Estimation in Deferred Acceptance with Partial School Rankings

Describing Deferred Acceptance and Strategyproofness to Participants: Experimental Analysis

School Choice Design, Risk Aversion and Cardinal Segregation

Designing Direct Matching Mechanism for India with Comprehensive Affirmative Action