Abstract:Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the effects of two endoscopic spine surgeries on the biomechanical properties of normal and osteoporotic spines.Methods: Based on CT images of a healthy adult volunteer, six finite element models were created. After validating the normal intact model, a concentrated force of 400 N and a moment of 7.5 Nm were exerted on the upper surface of L3 to simulate six physiological activities of the spine. Five types of indices were used to assess the biomechanical properties of the six models, range of motion (ROM), maximum displacement value, intervertebral disc stress, maximum stress value, and articular protrusion stress, and by combining them with finite element stress cloud.Results: In normal and osteoporotic spines, there was no meaningful change in ROM or disc stress in the two surgical models for the six motion states. N1 showed a decrease in maximum displacement value of 20.28% in right lateral bending. Model M2 increased maximum displacement values of 16.88% and 17.82% during left and right lateral bending, respectively. The maximum stress value of L4-L5 increased by 11.72% for model M2 during left rotation. In addition, using the same surgical approach, ROM, maximum displacement values, disc stress, and maximum stress values were more significant in the osteoporotic model than in the normal model.Conclusion: In both normal and osteoporotic spines, both surgical approaches were less disruptive to the physiologic structure of the spine. Furthermore, using the same endoscopic spine surgery, normal spine biomechanical properties are superior to osteoporotic spines.

Biomechanical Evaluation Of Two Endoscopic Spine Surgery Methods For Treating Lumbar Disc Herniation: A Finite Element Studies