Using the EORTC-QLQ-C30 in clinical practice for patient management: identifying scores requiring a clinician’s attention

Claire F Snyder, Amanda L Blackford, Toru Okuyama, Tatsuo Akechi, Hiroko Yamashita, Tatsuya Toyama, Michael A Carducci, Albert W Wu
2013-12-01
Abstract:Purpose Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) are used increasingly for individual patient management. Identifying which PRO scores require a clinician’s attention is an ongoing challenge. Previous research used a needs assessment to identify EORTC-QLQ-C30 cutoff scores representing unmet needs. This analysis attempted to replicate the previous findings in a new and larger sample. Methods This analysis used data from 408 Japanese ambulatory breast cancer patients who completed the QLQ-C30 and Supportive Care Needs Survey-Short Form-34 (SCNS-SF34). Applying the methods used previously, SCNS-SF34 item/domain scores were dichotomized as no versus some unmet need. We calculated area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) to evaluate QLQ-C30 scores’ ability to discriminate between patients with no versus …
What problem does this paper attempt to address?