Malignancy rates through 5 years of follow-up in patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis treated with guselkumab: Pooled results from the VOYAGE 1 and VOYAGE 2 trials

Andrew Blauvelt,Mark Lebwohl,Katelyn Rowland,Ya-Wen Yang,Daphne Chan,Megan Miller,Yin You,Jenny Yu,Diamant Thaҫi,Peter Foley,Richard G. Langley,Kim A. Papp
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaad.2023.03.035
IF: 15.487
2023-04-01
Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology
Abstract:BACKGROUND: Malignancy risk surveillance among patients receiving long-term immunomodulatory psoriasis treatments remains an important safety objective.OBJECTIVE: To report malignancy rates in patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis treated with guselkumab for up to 5 years versus general and psoriasis patient populations.METHODS: Cumulative rates of malignancies/100 patient-years (PY) were evaluated in 1721 guselkumab-treated patients from VOYAGE 1 and 2. Malignancy rates (excluding nonmelanoma skin cancer [NMSC]) were compared with rates in the Psoriasis Longitudinal Assessment and Registry. Standardized incidence ratios comparing malignancy rates (excluding NMSC and cervical cancer in situ) between guselkumab-treated patients and the general US population using Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results data were calculated, adjusting for age, sex, and race.RESULTS: Of 1721 guselkumab-treated patients (>7100 PY), 24 had NMSC (0.34/100PY; basal:squamous cell carcinoma ratio, 2.2:1), and 32 had malignancies excluding NMSC (0.45/100PY). For comparison, the malignancy rate excluding NMSC was 0.68/100PY in the Psoriasis Longitudinal Assessment and Registry. Malignancy rates (excluding NMSC/cervical cancer in situ) in guselkumab-treated patients were consistent with those expected in the general US population (standardized incidence ratio = 0.93).LIMITATIONS: Inherent imprecision in determining malignancy rates.CONCLUSIONS: In patients treated with guselkumab for up to 5 years, malignancy rates were low and generally consistent with rates in general and psoriasis patient populations.
dermatology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?