Efficacy and safety of robotic vs. laparoscopic gastrectomy for patients with gastric cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis
Zhenshun Li,Wei Zhou,Wanli Yang,Yan Miao,Yujie Zhang,Lili Duan,Liaoran Niu,Junfeng Chen,Aqiang Fan,Qibin Xie,Siyu Wei,Han Bai,Chenyang Wang,Xi Chen,Yu Han,Liu Hong
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/JS9.0000000000001826
2024-06-14
Abstract:Background: The emergence of robotic surgical systems compensated for the technological shortcomings of laparoscopic approaches. However, whether robotic gastrectomy (RG) has better perioperative outcomes and survival than laparoscopic gastrectomy (LG) for gastric cancer is still unclear but increasingly drawing attention. Materials and methods: In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we searched the PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library as of January 20, 2024 and referenced list of eligible articles for all published studies comparing RG and LG for patients with gastric cancer, Data on study characteristics, individual characteristics, and outcome parameters were extracted. The quality of studies was assessed using the Revised Cochrane risk-of-bias 2 tool and the risk of bias in non-randomized studies of interventions tool. The main outcome measures were overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS). Results: We identified 3641 articles, of which 72 studies (30081 patients) were included in the meta-analysis. Compared with LG, RG was associated with higher OS [hazard ratio (HR)=0.89, 95% CI=0.83 to 0.96), lower rate of overall postoperative complications [odds ratio (OR)=0.77, 95% CI=0.71 to 0.84], longer operating time [mean difference (MD)=35.53, 95% CI=29.23 to 41.83], less estimated blood loss (MD=-37.45, 95% CI=-46.24 to -28.67), a higher number of retrieved lymph nodes (MD=1.88, 95% CI=0.77 to 3.00), faster postoperative recovery, and lower rate of conversion (OR=0.44, 95% CI=0.36 to 0.55). Mortality and DFS were not significantly different between the two groups. The subgroup of meta-analysis results also showed the advantages of robotic surgery over laparoscopic surgery in intracorporeal reconstruction, total gastrectomy, Ⅰ/Ⅱ stage, and BMI≥25, especially for patients with stage Ⅰ/Ⅱ, there is better overall survival and disease-free survival. Conclusion: Our findings point to robotic surgery having great benefits compared with laparoscopic surgery in gastric cancer. Our study may help inform decision-making in applying robotic surgical systems to clinical treatment.