Abstract:Transaction cost economics (TCE) is probably the most widely accepted theory on how firms can gain competitive advantage through efficient organization of their economic transactions. However, by focusing on the competitive environment in which companies operate, it abstracts from the cultural context in which governance decisions are made. We study the cultural boundedness of TCE using two seminal cultural theories: the political science/sociology framework of Inglehart and the management science framework of Hofstede. We use these theories to develop (main-effect) hypotheses about the cultural contexts in which TCE has higher predictive power as well as (interaction) hypotheses regarding particular cultural contexts that may inherently be more inclined than others to adopt certain non-market governance modes if the market “fails.” Hypotheses are tested using a meta-analysis on data collected from 128 studies from 12 countries on 3 continents, representing governance decisions of 60,926 companies. We find that TCE is a universal theory across all cultural contexts. This being said, we find that in societies low on power distance and in societies characterized by a strong emphasis on secular-rational and self-expression values, companies are more strongly guided in their governance decisions by economic, transaction-cost considerations than companies in societies high on power distance and in countries that are characterized by traditional and survival values. Further, TCE’s power to predict the specific type of non-market governance employed by the firm is systematically moderated by the national culture in which the firm operates. The power of TCE for predicting hierarchical governance is higher in countries that rate high on secular-rational values and on uncertainty avoidance and low on long-term orientation, whereas TCE is more diagnostic for predicting relational governance in countries high on self-expression values and low on power distance and on uncertainty avoidance. In sum, our meta-analysis provides support for our thesis that to fully understand governance choices made by firms, we need to integrate TCE and cultural theory. While managers around the world are guided by economic considerations, the cultural context in which they operate exerts a substantial—and predictable—contingent effect on their governance choices.

The function of authority in transaction cost economics

Transaction cost economics and business administration

The Nature of the Market:From an Invisible Hand to a Tangible Network

Why Transaction Cost Economics Failed and How to Fix It

Transaction cost economics and the roles of national culture: a test of hypotheses based on Inglehart and Hofstede

Governing Farmland Conversion for Urban Development from the Perspective of Transaction Cost Economics

The Importance of Being Trusted: Transaction Costs and Policy Network Theory

From Linear to Circular Economy: a Transaction Cost Approach to the Ecological Transformation of the Firm

Contract Law and the Boundaries of the Firm

Firms, Contracts, and Financial Structure

The governance of global value chains

“And Who Are You?”: A Performative Perspective on Authority in Organizations

Do Norms Matter in Marketing Relationships?

The Firm as a Subsociety: Purpose, Justice, and the Theory of the Firm

Theory of the Firm : Managerial Behavior , Agency Costs and Ownership Structure

Formal Authority,Holdup Problem,and Enterprise Viability

"Contingency, Irony, and Solidarity" in the Era of Polycrisis: Institutionalist Economics beyond the t/T Duality

A Formal Transaction Cost-Based Analysis of the Economic Feasibility of Data Spaces and Service Ecosystems

Ownership structure and control in incomplete market economies with transferable utility

A needs theory of governance: taking transaction cost theory back to humanistic economics and self-actualisation

Transaction cost theory: past, present and future