Abstract:Background: Social media has been extensively used for the communication of health-related information and consecutively for the potential spread of medical misinformation. Conventional systematic reviews have been published on this topic to identify original articles and to summarize their methodological approaches and themes. A bibliometric study could complement their findings, for instance, by evaluating the geographical distribution of the publications and determining if they were well cited and disseminated in high-impact journals. Objective: The aim of this study was to perform a bibliometric analysis of the current literature to discover the prevalent trends and topics related to medical misinformation on social media. Methods: The Web of Science Core Collection electronic database was accessed to identify relevant papers with the following search string: ALL=(misinformati* OR "wrong informati*" OR disinformati* OR "misleading informati*" OR "fake news*") AND ALL=(medic* OR illness* OR disease* OR health* OR pharma* OR drug* OR therap*) AND ALL=("social media*" OR Facebook* OR Twitter* OR Instagram* OR YouTube* OR Weibo* OR Whatsapp* OR Reddit* OR TikTok* OR WeChat*). Full records were exported to a bibliometric software, VOSviewer, to link bibliographic information with citation data. Term and keyword maps were created to illustrate recurring terms and keywords. Results: Based on an analysis of 529 papers on medical and health-related misinformation on social media, we found that the most popularly investigated social media platforms were Twitter (n=90), YouTube (n=67), and Facebook (n=57). Articles targeting these 3 platforms had higher citations per paper (>13.7) than articles covering other social media platforms (Instagram, Weibo, WhatsApp, Reddit, and WeChat; citations per paper <8.7). Moreover, social media platform-specific papers accounted for 44.1% (233/529) of all identified publications. Investigations on these platforms had different foci. Twitter-based research explored cyberchondria and hypochondriasis, YouTube-based research explored tobacco smoking, and Facebook-based research studied vaccine hesitancy related to autism. COVID-19 was a common topic investigated across all platforms. Overall, the United States contributed to half of all identified papers, and 80% of the top 10 most productive institutions were based in this country. The identified papers were mostly published in journals of the categories public environmental and occupational health, communication, health care sciences services, medical informatics, and medicine general internal, with the top journal being the Journal of Medical Internet Research. Conclusions: There is a significant platform-specific topic preference for social media investigations on medical misinformation. With a large population of internet users from China, it may be reasonably expected that Weibo, WeChat, and TikTok (and its Chinese version Douyin) would be more investigated in future studies. Currently, these platforms present research gaps that leave their usage and information dissemination warranting further evaluation. Future studies should also include social platforms targeting non-English users to provide a wider global perspective.

Falsch- und Desinformation in sozialen Medien: Ansätze zur Minimierung von Risiken in digitaler Kommunikation über Gesundheit

Can you be Mindful? The Effectiveness of Mindfulness-Driven Interventions in Enhancing the Digital Resilience to Fake News on COVID-19

Three prophylactic interventions to counter fake news on social media

Systematic Literature Review on the Spread of Health-related Misinformation on Social Media

Impact of Social Reference Cues on Misinformation Sharing on Social Media: Series of Experimental Studies

Toolbox of individual-level interventions against online misinformation

Digital Mis/Disinformation and Public Engagment with Health and Science Controversies: Fresh Perspectives from Covid-19

Systematic Literature Review on Driving Factors of COVID-19 Related Fake News Sharing on Social Media

Pseudo-positive Information and COVID-19: Reasons behind Sharing Fake News (Georgian Social Media Analysis)

Social Media COVID-19 Misinformation Interventions Viewed Positively, But Have Limited Impact

Health-related fake news on social media platforms: A systematic literature review

Fact-checking as risk communication: the multi-layered risk of misinformation in times of COVID-19

Medical and Health-Related Misinformation on Social Media: Bibliometric Study of the Scientific Literature

Discovering why people believe disinformation about healthcare

Combating Health Misinformation in Social Media: Characterization, Detection, Intervention, and Open Issues

Prevalence of Health Misinformation on Social Media-Challenges and Mitigation Before, During, and Beyond the COVID-19 Pandemic: Scoping Literature Review

Understanding the "Infodemic" Threat: A Case Study of the COVID-19 Pandemic

Mitigating infodemics: The relationship between news exposure and trust and belief in COVID-19 fake news and social media spreading

COVID-19 Misinformation and Disinformation on Social Networks -- The Limits of Veritistic Countermeasures

The social media Infodemic of health-related misinformation and technical solutions.

Misinformation on Social Media Platforms in the Global Crisis of Coronavirus