Abstract:Background An evidence and consensus‐based instrument is needed to classify central venous access device‐associated skin impairments. Aim The aim of this study was to design and evaluate the central venous access device‐associated skin impairment classification tool. Design A two‐phase modified Delphi study. Methods This two‐phase study consisted of a literature review, followed by the development and validation of a classification instrument, by experts in the fields of central venous access devices and wound management (Phase 1). The instrument was tested (Phase 2) using 38 clinical photographs of a range of relevant skin impairments by the same expert panel. The expert panel consisted of registered nurses who were clinical researchers (n = 4) and clinical experts (n = 3) with an average of 24 years of nursing and research experience and 11 years of experience in wound management. Measures to assess preliminary content validity and inter‐rater reliability were used. Results The instrument consists of five overarching aetiological classifications, including contact dermatitis, mechanical injury, infection, pressure injury and complex clinical presentation, with 14 associated subcategory diagnoses (e.g., allergic dermatitis, skin tear and local infection), with definitions and signs and symptoms. High agreement was achieved for preliminary scale content validity and item content validity (I‐CVI = 1). Inter‐rater reliability of aetiologies was high. The overall inter‐rater reliability of individual definitions and signs and symptoms had excellent agreement. Conclusion The development and preliminary validation of this classification tool provide a common language to guide the classification and assessment of central venous access device‐associated skin impairment. Impact The comprehensive and validated classification tool will promote accurate identification of central venous access device‐associated skin impairment by establishing a common language for healthcare providers. The availability of this tool can reduce clinical uncertainty, instances of misdiagnosis and the potential for mismanagement. Consequently, it will play a pivotal role in guiding clinical decision‐making, ultimately enhancing the quality of treatment and improving patient outcomes. Reporting Method The Guidance on Conducting and Reporting Delphi Studies (CREDES) was adhered to. Patient or Public Contribution No patient or public contribution.

Reporting Medical Device-Related Pressure Ulcers: An international Delphi consensus study

Using a prognostic medical device for early identification of pressure ulcers: protocol for study design

International e-Delphi survey to define best practice in the reporting of intracranial pressure monitoring recording data

Use of point-of-care subepidermal moisture devices to detect localised oedema and evaluate pressure injury risk: A scoping review

An exploration of the perspectives of individuals and their caregivers on pressure ulcer/injury prevention and management to inform the development of a clinical guideline

Using a modified Delphi methodology to gain consensus on the use of dressings in chronic wounds management

Exploring medical device-related pressure injuries in a single intensive care setting: A longitudinal point prevalence study

Development, dissemination and evaluation of a smartphone-based app for pressure ulcer/injury prevention and treatment for use at the bedside

Pressure Injury Prevention and Management: A Gap Analysis Using Key Stakeholder Engagement

Heel Pressure Injuries: Consensus-Based Recommendations for Assessment and Management

International recommendations for a vascular access minimum dataset: a Delphi consensus-building study

Impact of the degree of synergy between patient and nurse perceptions on the clinical outcome of pressure injury prevention: a mixed-methods systematic review protocol

Development of a core outcome set for use in research evaluations of interventions for venous leg ulceration: International eDelphi consensus

Prevalence, severity, and characteristics of medical device related pressure injuries in adult intensive care patients: A prospective observational study

ACCORD guideline for reporting consensus-based methods in biomedical research and clinical practice: a study protocol

Evaluating the impact on hospital acquired pressure injury/ulcer incidence in a United Kingdom NHS Acute Trust from use of sub-epidermal scanning technology.

Current status of medical device malfunction reporting: using end user experience to identify current problems

Development and Preliminary Validation of a Central Venous Access Device‐Associated Skin Impairment Classification Tool Using Modified Delphi and Clinimetric Methods

The complex interplay between mechanical forces, tissue response and individual susceptibility to pressure ulcers

Medical Device Testing: Methods, Significance, and Clinical Applications

The Prevalence And Incidence Of Community-Acquired Pressure Injury A Protocol For Systematic Review And Meta-Analysis