Compliance with new drug use and the effect of discrepant drug susceptibility testing on MDR/RR-TB treatment

J E Shin,D Jeon,J Mok,J-J Yim,Y-S Kwon,K-W Jo,T S Shim,J.E. Shin,D. Jeon,J. Mok,J-J. Yim,Y-S. Kwon,K-W. Jo,T.S. Shim
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5588/ijtld.23.0237
2024-02-01
The International Journal of Tuberculosis and Lung Disease
Abstract:BACKGROUND: Following the WHO???s announcement in 2018, the use of new drugs was recommended for all patients with multidrug-resistant TB (MDR-TB) in Korea. This study aimed to evaluate adherence to new anti-TB drug regimens and implementation of molecular drug susceptibility testing (mDST) in Korea. METHODS: Nationwide, 560 patients were reported as having MDR-TB in 2021. The implementation of mDST and new anti-TB drug use were analysed. The discrepancy between mDST and phenotypic DST (pDST) results and their implications on the use of new anti-TB drugs were also analysed. The use of novel anti-TB drugs has been approved by the National TB Expert Committee. RESULTS: The non-adherence rate in MDR-TB patients was 14.3%. The mDST implementation rate was 96.1%. Of the 459 patients who underwent both mDST and pDST, the discordance rate for rifampicin (RIF) resistance was 22.6% (n = 104), of which 72.1% (n = 75) were resistant on mDST but susceptible on pDST. The discrepancy in mDST and pDST results related to RIF resistance was found to be the main cause of non-adherence to new drug regimen. CONCLUSION: Comprehensive training on how to interpret conflicting results between mDST and pDST could enhance the utilisation of new drugs in the treatment of MDR/RIF-resistant TB.
infectious diseases,respiratory system
What problem does this paper attempt to address?