Abstract:Background: There is a steadily growing number of different reconstructive surgical procedures for hypospadias that were tested on animal models prior to their human application. However, the clinical translatability and reproducibility of the results encountered in preclinical urethral reconstruction experiments is considered poor, with significant factors contributing to the poor design and reporting of animal experiments. Our objective was to evaluate the quality of the design and reporting in published articles of urethral reconstructive preclinical studies. Methods: Both PubMed and EMBASE databases were searched for animal urethral repair experiments between January 2014 and September 2019. Internal quality (bias) was evaluated through several signaling questions arising from the Systematic Review Centre for Laboratory animal Experimentation (SYRCLE), while the quality of reporting was assessed by the Animal Research: Reporting of In vivo Experiments (ARRIVE) guidelines by scoring of a 20-item checklist. Results: A total of 638 articles were initially screened after the literature search. Employing the inclusion and exclusion criteria, 30 studies were chosen for full-text screening and 21 studies were considered eligible for the quality assessment. The mean score of the checklist was 66%. The elements that accomplished the highest grades included the number of animals utilized, the number in each investigational and control group, and the delineation of investigational conclusions. The items that were least commonly stated comprised information about the experimental method, housing and husbandry, rationalization of the number of animals, and reporting of adverse events. No paper stated the sample size estimation. Conclusion: We found that several critical experiment design principles were poorly reported, which hinders a rigorous appraisal of the scientific quality and reproducibility of the experiments. A comprehensive implementation of the ARRIVE guidelines in animal studies exploring urethral repair is necessary to facilitate the effective translation of preclinical research findings into clinical therapies.

The current state of tissue engineering in the management of hypospadias

The Individual Therapy of Urethrocutaneous Fistula after Primary Urethroplasty for Hypospadias

Scaffold-based tissue engineering strategies for urethral repair and reconstruction

The Application of Pedicled Tunica Vaginalis Flap Cover New Urethra in Redo and Second-Stage Hypospadias Repair

Hypospadias: anatomy, etiology, and technique

Looking beyond the dartos fascia and tunica vaginalis: reviewing the stance of common adjuvant covering biomaterials in hypospadiology

Developmental Status and Perspectives for Tissue Engineering in Urology

Advances in 3D bioprinting for urethral tissue reconstruction

Cells Involved in Urethral Tissue Engineering: Systematic Review

The Regenerative Microenvironment of the Tissue Engineering for Urethral Strictures

Preclinical Experiments for Hypospadias Surgery: Systematic Review and Quality Assessment

The Clinical Application of Acellular Urinary Bladder Submucosa to Reconstructive the Urethral Duct of Hypospadias Patients

Application of 3D Bioprinting in Urology

Application of Biomaterials and Tissue Engineering in Bladder Regeneration

Histological and Biochemical Evaluation of Urethral Scar following Three Different Hypospadias Repairs: An Experimental Study in Rabbits

Hypospadias: an update

The benefit of tissue sealant on urethroplasty in hypospadias patients - A systematic review and meta-analysis

In Vivo Biomechanical Assessment of Anterior Rabbit Urethra After Repair of Surgically Created Hypospadias

A biomechanical, histological and biochemical study in an experimental rabbit hypospadias repair model using scanning acoustic microscopy

Hypospadias surgery: when, what and by whom?

Stretchable collagen-coated polyurethane-urea hydrogel seeded with bladder smooth muscle cells for urethral defect repair in a rabbit model