Abstract:Background: Cross-sectoral and interdisciplinary care and case management can contribute to an improved integration of the primary care for patients with geriatric characteristics. Following this approach, the pilot study RubiN (Regional ununterbrochen betreut im Netz / Continuous Care in Regional Networks) implemented a specific geriatric Care and Case Management (CCM) in five certified practice networks of independent physicians in different regions in Germany. As part of the accompanying process-based evaluation of the project, a survey was conducted among general practitioners and other specialists from these networks in order to find out how, in their view, collaboration with case managers can improve medical care of geriatric patients and contribute to closing possible gaps in primary care structures. Methods: The overall project RubiN, which was designed as a pragmatic controlled trial, compared patients from five practice networks where CCM has been implemented (intervention networks), with patients from three networks where the intervention was not taking place (control networks). Physicians of all eight participating practice networks were included in the present survey. The survey was conducted via a self-developed questionnaire. Results: A total of 111 physicians participated in the survey, 76 of whom were part of an intervention network and 35 part of a control network. The calculated response rate was 15.4% (networks reported a total of approx. 720 members). 91,1% of the participants from intervention networks, who had joined RubiN with their patients, reported satisfaction with their collaboration with case managers (n=41 of 45). 87.0% of the physicians from intervention networks stated that care for geriatric patients had improved as a result of their participation in the pilot study (n=40 of 46). When asked about the overall quality of care provided for their geriatric patients, the assessments of participants from intervention networks were more positive than those of the participants from control networks (MV 3.48 vs. 3.27 on a scale of 1=poor to 5=very good). Agreement with whether external case managers could provide certain services was higher among participants from intervention networks compared to participants from control networks. This was the case, in particular, of services related to medical data collection and test procedures. Overall, both comparison groups showed a high level of willingness to delegate tasks to a CCM. Discussion: Delegation of tasks to geriatric case managers seems to be more readily accepted by physicians in intervention networks than by their colleagues from the control networks, especially as regards medical assessment methods and advanced advisory tasks. The results suggest that interventions in this domain were able to convince physicians of the value that case managers can bring to medical practice and help resolve reservations and skepticism. Especially, the implemented CCM seemed to be an effective way of generating geriatric anamnestic data and fostering the flow of general patient-centered information. Conclusion: From the point of view of general practitioners and other specialists participating in the intervention, CCM has been successfully implemented in their practice networks and seems to be a worthwhile approach that will help provide better coordinated and more team-oriented care to their geriatric patients.

"So at least now I know how to deal with things myself, what I can do if it gets really bad again"—experiences with a long-term cross-sectoral advocacy care and case management for severe multiple sclerosis: a qualitative study

Development of a Long-Term Cross-Sectoral Case and Care Management Manual for Patients With Severe Multiple Sclerosis and Their Caregivers

Unmet needs of caregivers of severely affected multiple sclerosis patients: A qualitative study

Multiple Sclerosis Multidisciplinary Care: a national survey and lessons for the global community

Patient Assessment Chronic Illness Care (PACIC) and its associations with quality of life among Swiss patients with systemic sclerosis: a mixed methods study

The Multiple Sclerosis Care Unit

Experiences in Coping with Stress-A Qualitative Study of Family Caregivers of Children with Medical Complexity

Registered nurse case managers' work experiences with a person-centered collaborative healthcare model: an interview study

Structural characteristics and contractual terms of specialist palliative homecare in Germany

[Coordinated primary care of older patients with complex needs. The perspective of family doctors in the light of a case management project within practice networks of independent physicians in Germany]

Participant perspectives of a home-based palliative approach for people with severe multiple sclerosis: A qualitative study

Unmet needs of people with severe multiple sclerosis and their carers: qualitative findings for a home-based intervention

A Case Management Approach in Stroke Care: A Mixed-Methods Acceptance Analysis From the Perspective of the Medical Profession

Cognitive impairment and its impact on employment: a qualitative interview-based study involving healthcare professionals and people living with multiple sclerosis

Case management for people with acquired brain injury: feasibility and effectiveness of a two-year pragmatic randomized controlled trial

A Qualitative Exploration of the Socioecological Influences Shaping the Diagnostic Experience and Self‐Management Practices Among People Newly Diagnosed With Multiple Sclerosis

Palliative Care Aspects in Multiple Sclerosis

Multiple sclerosis and quality of life: The role of cognitive impairment on quality of life in people with multiple sclerosis

Coordination of care for multimorbid patients from the perspective of general practitioners - a qualitative study

Costs and quality of life in multiple sclerosis

Exploring the relationship between neurologists and older persons with multiple sclerosis through the lens of social support theory