Abstract:Objectives: Evaluating peripheral neuropathy mainly relies on physical examination, patient history, and electrophysiological studies. High-resolution ultrasound is a fast, noninvasive modality for dynamic nerve assessment that enables the length of the nerve to be examined. Magnetic resonance imaging is preferred for examining deeper nerves with a high contrast resolution; its use shows excellent benefit in patients with atypical presentation, equivocal diagnosis, suspected secondary causes, and postsurgical relapse. We aimed to assess the measurements and criteria for both ultrasound and magnetic resonance neurography for the diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome, based mainly on the three measurements assessed by Buchberger et al. Methods: This prospective study was conducted to test diagnostic accuracy. Thirty-two patients who presented clinically with, and were diagnosed by electrophysiological tests as having, carpal tunnel syndrome participated. Superficial ultrasound of the wrist joint was performed on all participants, followed by magnetic resonance imaging within 1 week of ultrasonography. Results: The three main parameters of cross-sectional area measurement, distal nerve flattening, and flexor retinaculum bowing indices showed positive occurrences of 93.7%, 59.4%, and 59.4%, respectively; 90.6% of patients had decreased nerve echotexture. The diagnostic ability of magnetic resonance imaging was decreased when cross-sectional area measurements were used: positive results were achieved in 81.2% of patients, but the positive results showing the distal tunnel nerve increased flattening and bowed flexor retinaculum slightly decreased to 56.2% for each. A high T2 signal of the median nerve was observed in 90.6% of patients. In an agreement analysis, we found a statistically significant difference that supported the use of ultrasound as a primary diagnostic modality for carpal tunnel syndrome. However, magnetic resonance imaging improved tissue characterization and was a good diagnostic modality, with a statistically significant difference, for cases of secondary carpal tunnel syndrome, detection of the underlying entrapping cause, and early abnormality detection in the innervated muscle. Conclusions: Our results demonstrate that ultrasound examination can be used as the first imaging modality after physician evaluation, with results comparable to those of electrophysiological studies for evaluating carpal tunnel syndrome and determining its cause. Magnetic resonance neurography examination is the second step in detecting secondary causes in cases with suspected early muscle denervation changes that cannot be elicited by ultrasound or in cases with equivocal results.

Refining quality measures for electrodiagnostic testing in suspected carpal tunnel syndrome to account for acceptable variations in practice: Expert review process

The Impact of Reference Standard on Diagnostic Testing Characteristics for Carpal Tunnel Syndrome: A Systematic Review

Diagnostic accuracy of sensory and motor tests for the diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome: a systematic review

Clinical and electrodiagnostic testing of carpal tunnel syndrome: a narrative review

A revised approach for electrodiagnosis-based severity classification in carpal tunnel syndrome

Association between electrodiagnosis and neuromuscular ultrasound in the diagnosis and assessment of severity of carpal tunnel syndrome

Predictors of Normal Electrodiagnostic Testing in the Evaluation of Suspected Carpal Tunnel Syndrome.

Sonographic Measurement of Median Nerve Cross‐Sectional Area to Determine Severity of Carpal Tunnel Syndrome: A Cautionary Tale

Borderline Nerve Conduction Velocities for Median Neuropathy at the Carpal Tunnel.

Accuracy of Provocative Tests for Carpal Tunnel Syndrome

Assessment of validity, reliability, responsiveness and bias of three commonly used patient-reported outcome measures in carpal tunnel syndrome

Evaluation of electrophysiological examinations for the diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome

Sensitivity, Specificity, and Reliability of the CTS-6 for Carpal Tunnel Syndrome Administered by Medical Assistants

Assessing the severity of carpal tunnel syndrome during physical examination by measuring two-point discrimination: Post-hoc analysis of prospectively collected data

The Scratch-Collapse Test: Are Electrodiagnostic Changes Measurable?

The six-item CTS symptoms scale and palmar pain scale in carpal tunnel syndrome

Ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging neurography assessment of diagnostic criteria in patients with carpal tunnel syndrome using electrophysiological tests as gold standard: A prospective study

Development and validation of a clinical model for predicting the severity of carpal tunnel syndrome

Pain mechanisms in carpal tunnel syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis of quantitative sensory testing outcomes

Carpal tunnel syndrome: Analyzing efficacy and utility of clinical tests and various diagnostic modalities

Diagnostic Accuracy of Integrating Ultrasound and Shear Wave Elastography in Assessing Carpal Tunnel Syndrome Severity: a Prospective Observational Study