Abstract:In the era of big-data, individuals and institutions store their sensitive data on clouds, and these data are often analyzed and computed by MapReduce frameworks (e.g., Spark). However, releasing the computation result on these data may leak privacy. Differential Privacy (DP) is a powerful method to preserve the privacy of an individual data record from a computation result. Given an input dataset and a query, DP typically perturbs an output value with noise proportional to sensitivity, the greatest change on an output value when a record is added to or removed from the input dataset. Unfortunately, directly computing the sensitivity value for a query and an input dataset is computationally infeasible, because it requires adding or removing every record from the dataset and repeatedly running the same query on the dataset: a dataset of one million input records requires running the same query for more than one million times. This paper presents UPA, the first automated, accurate, and efficient sensitivity inferring approach for big-data mining applications. Our key observation is that MapReduce operators often have commutative and associative properties in order to enable parallelism and fault tolerance among computers. Therefore, UPA can greatly reduce the repeated computations at runtime while computing a precise sensitivity value automatically for general big-data queries. We compared UPA with FLEX, the most relevant work that does static analysis on queries to infer sensitivity values. Based on an extensive evaluation on nine diverse Spark queries, UPA supports all the nine evaluated queries, while FLEX supports only five of the nine queries. For the five queries which both UPA and FLEX can support, UPA enforces DP with five orders of magnitude more accurate sensitivity values than FLEX. UPA has reasonable performance overhead compared to native Spark. UPA's source code is available on https://github.com/hku-systems/UPA.

$Υ$-DB: Managing scientific hypotheses as uncertain data

Managing large-scale scientific hypotheses as uncertain and probabilistic data with support for predictive analytics

UPA: an Automated, Accurate and Efficient Differentially Private Big-Data Mining System

BayesDB: A probabilistic programming system for querying the probable implications of data

Uncertainty Handling in a Tabular Representation

Sensitivity Analysis and Explanations for Robust Query Evaluation in Probabilistic Databases.

Dealing with Uncertainty: A Survey of Theories and Practices

Uncertain Spatial Data Management:An Overview

H-DB: Yet Another Big Data Hybrid System of Hadoop and DBMS

Embedding expert knowledge and hypothetical data bases into a data base system

Histograms and Wavelets on Probabilistic Data

H-Tree: a hybrid structure for confidence computation in probabilistic databases

Hypothesis Management in Situation-Specific Network Construction

Uncertainty Management for Fuzzy Decision Support Systems

Scalable Probabilistic Databases with Factor Graphs and MCMC

LabxDB: versatile databases for genomic sequencing and lab management

Discovering Associations with Uncertainty from Large Databases

A Unified Approach to Ranking in Probabilistic Databases

Human Uncertainty in Concept-Based AI Systems

Hardware-Efficient Data Imputation through DBMS Extensibility

Dempster--Shafer Theory and Statistical Inference with Weak Beliefs