Abstract:In numerous classification problems, class distribution is not balanced. For example, positive examples are rare in the fields of disease diagnosis and credit card fraud detection. General machine learning methods are known to be suboptimal for such imbalanced classification. One popular solution is to balance training data by oversampling the underrepresented (or undersampling the overrepresented) classes before applying machine learning algorithms. However, despite its popularity, the effectiveness of sampling has not been rigorously and comprehensively evaluated. This study assessed combinations of seven sampling methods and eight machine learning classifiers (56 varieties in total) using 31 datasets with varying degrees of imbalance. We used the areas under the precision-recall curve (AUPRC) and receiver operating characteristics curve (AUROC) as the performance measures. The AUPRC is known to be more informative for imbalanced classification than the AUROC. We observed that sampling significantly changed the performance of the classifier (paired t-tests P < 0.05) only for few cases (12.2% in AUPRC and 10.0% in AUROC). Surprisingly, sampling was more likely to reduce rather than improve the classification performance. Moreover, the adverse effects of sampling were more pronounced in AUPRC than in AUROC. Among the sampling methods, undersampling performed worse than others. Also, sampling was more effective for improving linear classifiers. Most importantly, we did not need sampling to obtain the optimal classifier for most of the 31 datasets. In addition, we found two interesting examples in which sampling significantly reduced AUPRC while significantly improving AUROC (paired t-tests P < 0.05). In conclusion, the applicability of sampling is limited because it could be ineffective or even harmful. Furthermore, the choice of the performance measure is crucial for decision making. Our results provide valuable insights into the effect and characteristics of sampling for imbalanced classification.

Anomaly detection-based undersampling for imbalanced classification problems

Imbalanced Data Sets Classification Method Based on Over-Sampling Technique

A cluster impurity-based hybrid resampling for imbalanced classification problems

Random Undersampling on Imbalance Time Series Data for Anomaly Detection

A Density-based Under-sampling Algorithm for Imbalance Classification

Efficient hybrid oversampling and intelligent undersampling for imbalanced big data classification

An Active Under-Sampling Approach for Imbalanced Data Classification

A Normal Distribution-Based Over-Sampling Approach to Imbalanced Data Classification

A New Sampling Approach for Classification of Imbalanced Data Sets with High Density.

Under-sampling Method Research in Class-Imbalanced Data

Classification-Based Self-Supervised Learning For Anomaly Detection

Selecting the Suitable Resampling Strategy for Imbalanced Data Classification Regarding Dataset Properties. An Approach Based on Association Models

Over-sampling Algorithm Based on Preliminary Classification in Imbalanced Data Sets Learning

An oversampling FCM-KSMOTE algorithm for imbalanced data classification

Trainable Undersampling for Class-Imbalance Learning.

An empirical evaluation of sampling methods for the classification of imbalanced data

Resampling approach for imbalanced data classification based on class instance density per feature value intervals

Selecting the suitable resampling strategy for imbalanced data classification regarding dataset properties

Gaussian Distribution Based Oversampling for Imbalanced Data Classification

A Novel Adaptive Undersampling Framework for Class-Imbalance Fault Detection