Abstract:In response to our commentary on the Dutch attempt to reduce the value-added tax (VAT) on fruits and vegetables to zero percent [author name] highlighted the importance of expanding perspectives on this issue to planetary health. We appreciate [author name's] insights and would like to emphasise our agreement with their overall message. It is indeed crucial to address public health nutrition challenges from a planetary health perspective, as compellingly argued by the EAT-Lancet commission ( Reference Willett, Rockström and Loken 1) . According to this commission, to safely feed 10 billion people by 2050 within planetary boundaries, food systems must evolve. This will require a dietary shift to more vegetables, fruits, whole grains, legumes, nuts, unsaturated oils, fewer red meat, processed meat, added sugar, refined grains and starchy vegetables. Like most dietary patterns that are good for human health ( Reference Rao, Afshin and Singh 2) , the EAT-Lancet diet is more expensive that current diets and making it affordable to the world's poor would require higher incomes, nutritional assistance and lower food prices ( Reference Hirvonen, Bai and Headey 3) . Our commentary on reducing VAT on fruits and vegetables tells a story about the political and administrative realities of formulating policies that might contribute to this dietary shift. The observed institutional friction to such policy in the Netherlands underscores the different priorities and languages spoken by health and fiscal experts with formal roles in government advise. Health and fiscal experts were observed to differ in their disciplinary agendas, goals, policy experiences and criteria for 'good' evidence. We further argue how the lack of integration between healthy food classifications hinders both groups from reaching common ground and that this confuses political decision-makers. This makes food policy an even harder area than it already is, a point also acknowledged by [author name] regarding the frequent omission of food intake in climate change policymaking. [Author name's] letter raises a pertinent question about the policymaking dynamics that might emerge if climate change and animal welfare were included in the formulation of fiscal public health nutrition policies. Based on our observations in the Netherlands, we hypothesise two possible scenarios. The first scenario involves increased institutional friction due to additional demarcation challenges. Policymakers would need to consider not only healthiness classifications but also varying perspectives on what constitutes food that is beneficial for human health, the planet and animal welfare. A recent German analysis showed that adapting the German VAT system towards a zero rate for organic vegetarian food and raising VAT for conventional meat and fish to 19 % would avoid 5·3 billion Euros in external climate costs ( Reference Oebel, Stein and Michalke 4) . Yet, deciding which foods should get a tax break and which ones should make up for lost revenue, and getting public and political support for these decisions, would become more complex as the criteria for these decisions expand, and as new experts with other priorities and languages get engaged. The alternative and more optimistic scenario is that incorporating animal welfare and, especially, climate change, could help facilitate a shift in which parts of government are responsible for food policy. There are currently few economic incentives and legal benchmarks for food policy to improve human health since food policy is predominantly shaped by agriculture, trade and economic policy departments whose institutional goals often focus on maximising sales ( Reference Swinburn, Kraak and Allender 5) . A planetary health argumentation might gain more traction because the Paris Climate Agreement imposes legal obligations on governments to achieve specified climate goals. There is an objective belief that 'Paris' contributes to significant progress in promoting renewable energy, but 'Paris' has thus far failed to deliver concrete changes to food systems, even when climate experts agree that changing food systems is necessary for addressing climate change ( Reference Fanzo and Miachon 6, Reference Medina Hidalgo, Nunn and Beazley 7) . As global temperatures rise, pressure on governments to address food policy might build, eventually elevating food policy to a higher agenda position and away from policy venues whose main goal is short-term economic growth. In this hypothetical scenario, institutional friction towards public health nutrition policie -Abstract Truncated-

Unveiling viewpoints on national food environment policies in the Dutch newspaper discourse: an interpretative media content analysis

Characterizing food environments of hospitals and long-term care facilities in the Netherlands: a mixed methods approach

Recent changes in the Dutch foodscape: socioeconomic and urban-rural differences

Health Promotion Values Underlying Healthy Eating Strategies in The Netherlands

The association of unhealthy and healthy food store accessibility with obesity prevalence among adults in the Netherlands: A spatial analysis

Content analysis of Dutch newspaper coverage of three tobacco control policies, 2017-2019

Public preferences for policies promoting a healthy diet: a discrete choice experiment

The portrayal of food marketing policy by Canadian news media

Authors' response to the letter entitled 'zero value-added tax on fruit and vegetables: beyond health and fiscal standards'

More than the worksite cafeteria: the workplace food environment of small and medium-sized enterprises in the Netherlands

Food availability, perceived food environment and social norm perceptions of healthy and vegetarian food consumption at a public music festival in the Netherlands: a cross-sectional study

Why we struggle to make progress in obesity prevention and how we might overcome policy inertia: Lessons from the complexity and political sciences

Health Communication and Consumer Behavior on Meat in Belgium: From BSE until Dioxin

Evolution of dietary patterns in Flanders: an ecological trend study on best-selling cookbook recipes (2008–2018) and their correlation with household purchases

Inequalities in Research on Food Environment Policies: An Evidence Map of Global Evidence from 2010-2020

Do EU consumers think about meat reduction when considering to eat a healthy, sustainable diet and to have a role in food system change?

Reflections on ideas and disputes in the context of the promotion of healthy eating

Healthy habits are no fun: How Dutch youth negotiate discourses about food, fit, fat, and fun

Demand-Side Food Policies for Public and Planetary Health

Exploring Australian News Media Portrayals of Sustainable and Plant-Based Diets

[Health Council of the Netherlands follows the ecological trail: a new venture]