The others are harassers, but my loved ones are not: the effect of closeness on offender justification

Nira Borges-Castells,Verónica Betancor,Armando Rodríguez-Pérez

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-024-06278-w

IF: 2.8

2024-07-13

Current Psychology

Abstract:People in one's close circle are very meaningful to them. That is why people could defend their loved ones even if they committed a transgression as serious as gender-based harassment. The purpose of this research was to determine if people judged and justified a sexual harassment behavior differently depending on the closeness they had toward the aggressor. In the first study (N = 233), we evidenced that people perceived the aggression and the aggressor more benevolently and justified it more when he was a relative or friend rather than a stranger. Moreover, we found the participant's gender was a highly relevant factor in assessing harassment, with men exhibiting more leniency as compared to women. In the second study (N = 225), we replicated these results, and found that, while closeness to the aggressor plays a very important role in the reaction toward harassment, closeness to the victim has no relevance. Furthermore, we evidenced that gender differences disappeared while controlling for sexism. These findings highlight the role of closeness and its implications for perception and justification of gender-based harassment. At the same time, they provide an insight into the importance of gender and sexism in the response to harassment.

psychology, multidisciplinary