Abstract:Endoscopic resection (ER) could be an alternative therapy for superficial duodenal epithelial tumor (SDET), considering the invasiveness of pancreaticoduodenectomy (Whipple’s procedure). However, detailed outcomes of ER have remained unknown, especially the differences according to the procedure type (EMR or ESD) and risk factors for complications, due to the rarity of SDET. The aim of this study was to elucidate the outcomes of ER. This was a retrospective observational study. From June 2010 to June 2017, a total of 321 cases of endoscopically resected SDET (146 EMR and 175 ESD) were included in this study. We analysed the proportions of resection in a single piece, R0 resection, perforation and bleeding as outcomes of ER and compared the outcomes between EMR and ESD groups. Next, we collected data about the features and clinical course of cases with complications. Associations among outcomes of ER and lesion features, endoscopic treatment type (ESD or EMR) were analysed using a multivariate logistic regression model. The proportion of resection in a single piece and R0 resection among all cases was 96.6% and 83.4%, respectively. ESD achieved resection in a single piece in over 95% of cases regardless of lesion size. The incidence of perforation and bleeding was 8.8% and 3.4%, respectively. Most incidences of perforation were successfully managed by conservative treatment and mortality rate was 0%, and all patients were discharged with a median hospital stay of 8.5 days (range 4-52 days). When the hospital stay duration was compared according to the lesion circumference, it was significantly longer for lesion present on the medial wall than for the other lesions (median 41 vs 7 days, p=0.0331, Wilcoxon’s rank-sum test). Multivariate analysis revealed, lesion size (OR 1.43 for every increase of 10 mm, 95% CI 1.13-1.83, p<0.01) and ESD (OR 13.6, 95% CI 1.70-108, p<0.01) was independently associated with the risk for perforation. For bleeding, being located on the medial wall was the only independent predictor for delayed bleeding (OR 4.56, 95% CI 1.27-16.4, p<0.01), whereas ESD was not associated with the risk of bleeding (OR 2.19, 95% CI 0.38-12.7, p=0.36). The present study revealed that ER achieved secure resection in a single piece, by choosing ESD or EMR according to the size of lesion. Medial wall was associated with worse outcomes such as bleeding or prolonged hospital stay after perforation.

Safety and efficacy of underwater endoscopic mucosal resection for 10–20 mm colorectal serrated lesions (SEA CLEAR study)

Comparison of Underwater vs Conventional Endoscopic Mucosal Resection of Intermediate-Size Colorectal Polyps

Underwater endoscopic mucosal resection for colorectal lesions: Can it be an “Underwater” revolution?

Underwater versus conventional endoscopic mucosal resection for superficial non-ampullary duodenal epithelial tumors ≤20mm: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Efficacy of Underwater Endoscopic Mucosal Resection for Nonpedunculated Colorectal Polyps: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Curative value of underwater endoscopic mucosal resection for submucosally invasive colorectal cancer

Treatment outcomes of endoscopic submucosal dissection and surgery for colorectal neoplasms in patients with ulcerative colitis

Efficacy and safety of cap-assisted endoscopic mucosal resection for superficial duodenal epithelial neoplasia ≤ 10 mm

Endoscopic mucosal resection for challenging colonic mucosal lesions

Safety and efficacy of underwater versus conventional endoscopic mucosal resection for colorectal polyps: Systematic review and meta-analysis of RCTs

Su1283 OUTCOMES AND RISK FACTORS OF COMPLICATIONS OF ENDOSCOPIC RESECTION FOR SUPERFICIAL DUODENAL EPITHELIAL NEOPLASIA: A RETROSPECTIVE OBSERVATIONAL STUDY OF 321 CONSECUTIVE CASES

Short- and long-term outcomes of endoscopically treated superficial non-ampullary duodenal epithelial tumors

Endoscopic hand suturing using a modified through‐the‐scope needle holder for mucosal closure after colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection: Prospective multicenter study (with video)

A multicenter, retrospective study of a through-the-needle injection-capable electrosurgical knife for endoscopic submucosal dissection

Underwater endoscopic mucosal resection: The third way for en bloc resection of colonic lesions?

A Sub-epithelial Lesion Algorithm For Endoscopic (SAFE) Resection In The Upper Gastrointestinal Tract

Long-term Outcomes of Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection for Colorectal Epithelial Neoplasms

Risk factors of unintentional piecemeal resection in endoscopic mucosal resection for colorectal polyps ≥ 10 mm

Endoscopic Mucosal Resection for Lesions at Gastroesophageal Junction

Outcomes in colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection for large protruded lesions: A retrospective multicenter study

Analysis of endoscopic mucosal resection and endoscopic submucosal dissection for gastrointestinal elevated lesions