Abstract:Background: Evidence regarding the presence and persistence of ethnic inequalities in mental healthcare is well established. The reasons for these inequalities and lack of progress in diminishing them are less understood. This meta-ethnography aims to provide a new conceptual understanding of how ethnic inequalities are created and sustained; this is essential to develop effective interventions. Specifically, we sought to understand why people from ethnic minority groups are underrepresented in primary care mental health service provision and overrepresented in crisis pathways and detention. Methods and findings: Following eMERGe guidelines for meta-ethnographies, we searched OpenGrey, Kings Fund, CINAHL, Medline, PsycINFO, and Social Care Online databases for qualitative articles published from database inception until October 2, 2022, using broad categories of search terms relating to "ethnicity AND (mental illness/mental health/emotional distress) AND (help-seeking/service utilisation/experience/perception/view)." We included all conceptually rich articles that used qualitative methods of data collection and analysis and excluded non-UK studies and those that focused solely on causation of mental illness. Our patient, public, and practitioner lived experience advisory group provided feedback and input on key stages of the project including search terms, research questions, data analysis, and dissemination. A total of 14,142 articles were identified; 66 met the inclusion criteria. We used reciprocal, refutational, and line of argument analytical approaches to identify convergence and divergence between studies. The synthesis showed that current models of statutory mental healthcare are experienced as a major barrier to the delivery of person-centred care to those in ethnic minority groups due to the perceived dominance of monocultural and reductionist frameworks of assessment and treatment (described as "medical" and "Eurocentric") and direct experiences of racist practice. The lack of socially oriented and holistic frameworks of knowledge and understanding in medical training and services is experienced as epistemic injustice, particularly among those who attribute their mental illness to experiences of migration, systemic racism, and complex trauma. Fear of harm, concerns about treatment suitability, and negative experiences with health providers such as racist care and medical neglect/injury contribute to avoidance of, and disengagement from, mainstream healthcare. The lack of progress in tackling ethnic inequalities is attributed to failures in coproduction and insufficient adoption of existing recommendations within services. Study limitations include insufficient recording of participant characteristics relating to generational status and social class in primary studies, which prevented exploration of these intersections. Conclusions: In this study, we found that the delivery of safe and equitable person-centred care requires a model of mental health that is responsive to the lived experiences of people in ethnic minority groups. For the people considered in this review, this requires better alignment of mental health services with social and anti-racist models of care. Our findings suggest that intersections related to experiences of racism, migration, religion, and complex trauma might be more relevant than crude ethnic group classifications. Strategies to tackle ethnic inequalities in mental healthcare require an evaluation of individual, systemic, and structural obstacles to authentic and meaningful coproduction and implementation of existing community recommendations in services.

Series: Public engagement with research. Part 2: GPs and primary care researchers working inclusively with minoritised communities in health research to help address inequalities

Series: Public engagement with research. Part 1: The fundamentals of public engagement with research

Series: Public engagement with research. Part 3: Sharing power and building trust through partnering with communities in primary care research

Contextualising and challenging under-representation in research in light of Cultural Trauma: a qualitative focus group and interview study

Inclusion of Marginalized Groups and Communities in Global Health Research Priority-Setting

Engagement in rapid public health research among young people from underserved communities: maximising opportunities and overcoming barriers

'The Listening Series': increasing equity, diversity and inclusion in patient and public involvement and engagement for policy research by listening to and learning from under-represented groups

Understanding ethnic inequalities in mental healthcare in the UK: A meta-ethnography

Health and social care experience and research perception of different ethnic minority populations in the East Midlands, United Kingdom (REPRESENT study)

Community Engagement Strategies for Underrepresented Racial and Ethnic Populations

Patient and researcher experiences of patient engagement in primary care health care research: A participatory qualitative study

Invisible Spectrum: A model for minority community public engagement in cancer research

Relational practices for meaningful inclusion in health research: Results of a deliberative dialogue study

The wider health and wellbeing needs of those accessing paediatric care in England: engaging with the hidden voices of children and young people

A meta-ethnography investigating relational influences on mental health and cancer-related health care interventions for racially minoritised people in the UK

25 Community research through creative methodologies as a tool to explore health inequalities within the urban locale

Successes and challenges of partnership working to tackle health inequalities using collaborative approaches to community-based research: mixed methods analysis of focus group evidence

Consultations With Muslims From Minoritised Ethnic Communities Living in Deprived Areas: Identifying Inequities in Mental Health Care and Support

Public perspectives on inequality and mental health: A peer research study

A mixed methods PAR study investigating social capital as a resource for Black and other racially minoritised communities in the UK: A study protocol

Digitalised primary care in the UK: The experiences of minoritised ethnic communities