Soil Acidification Can Be Improved under Different Long-Term Fertilization Regimes in a Sweetpotato–Wheat Rotation System

Huan Zhang,Lei Wang,Weiguo Fu,Cong Xu,Hui Zhang,Xianju Xu,Hongbo Ma,Jidong Wang,Yongchun Zhang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/plants13131740

2024-06-24

Plants

Abstract:Soil acidification is a significant form of agricultural soil degradation, which is accelerated by irrational fertilizer application. Sweetpotato and wheat rotation has emerged as an important rotation system and an effective strategy to optimize nutrient cycling and enhance soil fertility in hilly areas, which is also a good option to improve soil acidification and raise soil quality. Studying the effects of different fertilization regimes on soil acidification provides crucial data for managing it effectively. An eight-year field experiment explored seven fertilizer treatments: without fertilization (CK), phosphorus (P) and potassium (K) fertilization (PK), nitrogen (N) and K fertilization (NK), NP fertilization (NP), NP with K chloride fertilization (NPK1), NP with K sulfate fertilization (NPK2), and NPK combined with organic fertilization (NPKM). This study focused on the soil acidity, buffering capacity, and related indicators. After eight years of continuous fertilization in the sweetpotato–wheat rotation, all the treatments accelerated the soil acidification. Notably, N fertilization reduced the soil pH by 1.30–1.84, whereas N-deficient soil showed minimal change. Organic fertilizer addition resulted in the slowest pH reduction among the N treatments. Both N-deficient (PK) and organic fertilizer addition (NPKM) significantly increased the soil cation exchange capacity (CEC) by 8.83% and 6.55%, respectively, compared to CK. Similar trends were observed for the soil-buffering capacity (pHBC). NPK2 increased the soil K+ content more effectively than NPK1. NPKM reduced the sodium and magnesium content compared to CK, with the highest magnesium content among the treatments at 1.60 cmol·kg−1. Regression tree analysis identified the N input and soil magnesium and calcium content as the primary factors influencing the pHBC changes. Structural equation modeling showed that the soil pH is mainly influenced by the soil ammonium N content and pHBC, with coefficients of −0.28 and 0.29, respectively. Changes in the soil pH in the sweetpotato–wheat rotation were primarily associated with the pHBC and N input, where the CEC content emerged as the main factor, modulated by magnesium and calcium. Long-term organic fertilization enhances the soil pHBC and CEC, slowing the magnesium reduction and mitigating soil acidification in agricultural settings.

plant sciences

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The main problem that this paper attempts to solve is soil acidification. Specifically, the research focuses on the effects of different long - term fertilization treatments on soil acidification in the sweet potato - wheat rotation system. Through an eight - year field experiment, the study explored the effects of seven fertilization treatments (no fertilization, phosphorus - potassium fertilizer, nitrogen - potassium fertilizer, nitrogen - phosphorus fertilizer, nitrogen - phosphorus - chloride - potassium fertilizer, nitrogen - phosphorus - sulfate - potassium fertilizer, nitrogen - phosphorus - potassium organic fertilizer) on soil acidity, buffer capacity and related indicators. The research aims to provide key data to effectively manage soil acidification, optimize nutrient cycling, improve soil fertility and soil quality.

### Main research questions
1. **Acceleration of soil acidification**: Irrational fertilization is an important cause of the accelerated soil acidification. The study explored the influence mechanisms of different fertilization treatments on soil acidification.
2. **Changes in soil buffer capacity**: The study analyzed the effects of different fertilization treatments on soil buffer capacity and how these changes affect soil pH value.
3. **Changes in soil cation exchange capacity (CEC)**: The study examined the effects of different fertilization treatments on soil CEC and how these changes affect soil acidification.
4. **Comparison between organic fertilizers and chemical fertilizers**: The study compared the effects of organic fertilizers and chemical fertilizers on soil pH value and buffer capacity after long - term application to evaluate which fertilization method is more conducive to alleviating soil acidification.

### Research hypotheses
1. Long - term application of chemical fertilizers will lead to a significant decrease in soil pH value, mainly due to the accumulation of hydrogen ions during the nitrification process and the oxidation of sulfur - containing compounds.
2. Application of organic fertilizers will result in a lower degree of soil acidification and may even increase soil pH value, mainly because of the buffering effect of organic matter and enhanced microbial activity.
3. The soil buffer capacity of plots with organic fertilizer application will be higher than that of plots with chemical fertilizer application, because organic matter increases the soil cation exchange capacity and improves the soil structure.

Through these studies, the paper hopes to provide data support and theoretical basis for rationally guiding soil acidification control programs.