A comparative study of hepatic steatosis using two different qualitative ultrasound techniques measured based on magnetic resonance imaging‐derived proton density fat fraction

Sadanobu Ogawa,Takashi Kumada,Tatsuya Gotoh,Fumihiko Niwa,Hidenori Toyoda,Junko Tanaka,Masahito Shimizu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/hepr.14019
2024-02-02
Hepatology Research
Abstract:Improved algorithm of attenuation measurement showed the strong correlation with magnetic resonance imaging‐derived proton density fat fraction. An area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.926 was used for discriminating grade ≥1 steatosis. Improved algorithm of attenuation measurement is an accurate and simple method for quantifying hepatic steatosis and is expected to be used clinically in the future. Aim This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic performance of attenuation measurement (ATT; dual‐frequency method) and improved algorithm of ATT (iATT; reference method) for the assessment of hepatic steatosis using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)‐derived proton density fat fraction (PDFF) as the reference standard. Methods We prospectively analyzed 427 patients with chronic liver disease who underwent ATT, iATT, or MRI‐derived PDFF. Correlation coefficients were analyzed, and diagnostic values were evaluated by area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC). The steatosis grade was categorized as S0 (<5.2%), S1 (≥5.2%, <11.3%), S2 (≥11.3%, <17.1%), and S3 (≥17.1%) according to MRI‐derived PDFF values. Results The median ATT and iATT values were 0.61 dB/cm/MHz (interquartile range 0.55–0.67 dB/cm/MHz) and 0.66 dB/cm/MHz (interquartile range 0.57–0.77 dB/cm/MHz). ATT and iATT values increased significantly as the steatosis grade increased in the order S0, S1, S2, and S3 (p
gastroenterology & hepatology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?