Carcinogenic and non-carcinogenic risk assessment of heavy metals in PM2.5 air pollutant in Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia during the wintertime

Odbaatar Enkhjargal,Munkhnasan Lamchin,Xue Yi You,Jonathan Chambers,Davaagatan Tuyagerel,Renchinmyadag Tovuudorj,Zolzaya Khurelsukh,Enkhmaa Sarangerel,Nyamgerel Enkhtuya
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11869-024-01678-0
2024-11-30
Air Quality Atmosphere & Health
Abstract:In recent decades, fine particulate matter air pollution has increased due to coal combustion, resulting in detrimental effects on public health. This study aimed to assess the health risk associated with fine particulate matter (PM 2.5 ) using the US EPA risk assessment method and to determine which variable exerts a stronger influence. Eight heavy metals were measured from Ulaanbaatar city center and ger area within the scope of the project "Capacity development project for air pollution control in Ulaanbaatar Mongolia" funded by JICA (Japan International Cooperation Agency), and the processed results were disseminated. The concentration of heavy metals in the city center, from highest to lowest, were Cu > Cr > Mn > Ni > Zn > Ba > Pb > Mo > As, while in the ger area they were Cu > Zn > Mn > Ni > Cr > Pb > Ba > As > Mo. In both the city center and the ger area, 6 heavy metals, namely Zn, Cu, Pb, Ni, As and Mo, had values of less than 1 and exhibited no non-carcinogenic effects. Among the two other heavy metals, Cr (VI) and Mn, values were higher than 1 and demonstrated non-carcinogenic effects. As Ni and Cr (VI) are considered carcinogenic heavy metals and their assessment results exceeded the safe level, this implies a potential risk for cancer.
environmental sciences
What problem does this paper attempt to address?