Abstract:Positive allometry has been considered a hallmark of sexual selection whereby larger males of superior condition develop disproportionately larger ornaments for their body size compared to smaller males of poorer condition. Yet many structures known to be sexually selected often exhibit other allometric patterns. This has led to controversy over the utility of allometry in adequately capturing the signature of sexual selection, particularly if static (within population) and evolutionary (across species) allometries are functionally constrained by stabilising natural selection. To investigate this, we evaluated the allometries of ornamental head crests and dorsal fins across multiple species of blenny fish. In particular, we compared species that occupied an aquatic environment—where swimming performance was expected to have constrained ornament size—with species that have transitioned onto land where such biomechanical constraints on ornament size have been removed. Static allometries of both head crest and dorsal fin ornaments were found to be positive in males, but less so in females, across all species examined. This was consistent with the allometric theory of sexual selection that predicts positive allometry specifically in male ornamentation. Nevertheless, male allometric exponents were constrained in aquatic species whereas males of terrestrial species were free to exaggerate the size of their ornaments. Natural selection therefore appears to limit the evolution of ornament size in aquatics, and probably because of the biomechanical constraints associated with swimming. These differences in within‐population static allometry between aquatic and terrestrial species in turn manifested in a greater across‐species evolutionary allometric elevation, but not exponent, for terrestrial species relative to aquatic species. These findings indicate that the study of ornament allometries can provide useful insights into the role of sexual selection on ornament elaboration and also help reveal the presence of opposing natural selection that might result in alternative allometric patterns. The relationship between static and evolutionary allometries remains complex, and our results caution against the interpretation of evolutionary allometry in the absence of a clear understanding of the underlying static allometries associated with it. A free Plain Language Summary can be found within the Supporting Information of this article. A free Plain Language Summary can be found within the Supporting Information of this article.

On the Relationship between Ontogenetic and Static Allometry

Size, shape, and form: concepts of allometry in geometric morphometrics

History of the Concept of Allometry

Joint Analysis Model for Allometric Relationship of Multiple Partial Body Size and Entire Body Size

Allometry and phylogenetic divergence: Correspondence or incongruence?

Ecological implications of allometric relationships in American alligators (Alligator mississippiensis)

Ontogenetic drivers of morphological evolution in monitor lizards and allies (Squamata: Paleoanguimorpha), a clade with extreme body size disparity

The origin and maintenance of metabolic allometry in animals

Dynamic similarity and the peculiar allometry of maximum running speed

Removing Allometric Effects of Body Size in Morphological Analysis

Life-history implications of the allometric scaling of growth

Coevolution of body size and metabolic rate in vertebrates: a life‐history perspective

Multi-scaling allometry in human development, mammalian morphology, and tree growth

The Evolution of Body Size in Terrestrial Tetrapods

The evolution of positive allometry and exaggerated traits in a diverse beetle clade

Sexual dimorphism and allometry in human scapular morphology

The stabilising impact of natural selection on the allometry of sexual ornaments: Fish that escape locomotor constraints exhibit extravagant ornamentation

Utilizing geometric morphometrics to investigate gene function during organ growth: Insights through the study of beetle horn shape allometry

A PATH-ANALYTIC MODEL FOR THE MEASUREMENT OF SELECTION ON MORPHOLOGY

Misconceptions and issues regarding allometric scaling during the drug development process

Data transformation and model selection in bivariate allometry