Integrating Radiomics and Neural Networks for Knee Osteoarthritis Incidence Prediction

Shengfa Li,Peihua Cao,Jia Li,Tianyu Chen,Ping Luo,Guangfeng Ruan,Yan Zhang,Xiaoshuai Wang,Weiyu Han,Zhaohua Zhu,Qin Dang,Qianyi Wang,Mengdi Zhang,Qiushun Bai,Zhiyi Chai,Hao Yang,Haowei Chen,Mingze Tang,Arafat Akbar,Alexander Tack,David J Hunter,Changhai Ding
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/art.42915
2024-05-16
Arthritis & Rheumatology
Abstract:Objective Accurately predicting knee osteoarthritis (KOA) is essential for early detection and personalized treatment. We aimed to develop and test an MRI‐based Joint Space Radiomic Model (JS‐RM) to predict radiographic KOA incidence through neural networks by integrating meniscus and femorotibial cartilage radiomic features. Methods In the Osteoarthritis Initiative cohort, knees without radiographic KOA at baseline but at high risk for radiographic KOA were included. Case knees developed radiographic KOA whereas control knees did not over 4‐year. We randomly split the knees into development and test cohorts (D/T=8/2) and extracted features from baseline 3D‐DESS‐sequence MRI. Model performance was evaluated using an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), sensitivity, and specificity in both cohorts. Nine resident surgeons performed the reader experiment without/with the JS‐RM aid. Results Our study included 549 knees in the development cohort (275 cases vs. 274 controls) and 137 knees in the test cohort (68 cases vs. 69 controls). In the test cohort, JS‐RM had a favorable accuracy for predicting the radiographic KOA incidence with an AUC of 0.931 (95%CI: 0.876‐0.963), a sensitivity of 84.4% (95%CI: 83.9%‐84.9%), and a specificity of 85.6% (95%CI: 85.2%‐86.0%). The mean specificity and sensitivity of resident surgeons through MRI reading in predicting radiographic KOA incidence were increased from 0.474 (95%CI: 0.333‐0.614) and 0.586 (95%CI: 0.429‐0.743) without the assistance of JS‐RM to 0.874 (95%CI: 0.847‐0.901) and 0.812 (95%CI: 0.742‐0.881) with JS‐RM assistance, respectively (p
rheumatology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?