Abstract:Background Pencil beam scanning (PBS) proton therapy for moving targets is known to be impacted by interplay effects between the scanning beam and organ motion. While respiratory motion in the thoracic region is the major cause for organ motion, interplay effects depend on the delivery characteristics of proton accelerators. Purpose To evaluate the impact of different types of PBS proton accelerators and spot sizes on interplay effects, mitigations, and plan quality for Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy (SBRT) treatment of non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Methods Twenty NSCLC patients treated with photon SBRT were selected to represent varying tumor volumes and respiratory motion amplitudes (median: 0.6 cm with abdominal compression) for this retrospective study. For each patient, plans were created using: (1) cyclotron‐generated proton beams (CPB) with spot sizes of σ = 2.7–7.0 mm; (2) linear accelerator proton beams (LPB) (σ = 2.9–5.5 mm); and (3) linear accelerator proton minibeams (LPMB) (σ = 0.9–3.9 mm). The energy switching time is one second for CPB, and 0.005 s for LPMB and LPB. Plans were robustly optimized on the gross tumor volume (GTV) using each individual phase of four‐dimensional computed tomography (4DCT) scans. Initially, single‐field optimization (SFO) plans were evaluated; if the plan quality did not meet the dosimetric requirement, multi‐field optimization (MFO) was used. MFO plans were created for all patients for comparisons. For each patient, all plans were normalized to have the same dose received by 99% of the GTV. Interplay effects were evaluated by computing the dose on 10 breathing phases, based on the spot distribution. Volumetric repainting (VR) was performed 2–6 times for each plan. We compared volume receiving 100% of the prescribed dose (V100%RX) of the GTV, and normal lung V20Gy. Results Twelve of 20 plans can be optimized sufficiently with SFO. SFO plans were less sensitive to the interplay effect compared to MFO plans in terms of target coverage for both LPB and LPMB. The following comparisons showed results utilizing the MFO technique. In the interplay evaluation without repainting, the mean V100%RX of the GTV were 99.42 ± 0.6%, 97.52 ± 3.9%, and 94.49 ± 7.3% for CPB, LPB, and LPMB plans, respectively. Following VR (2 × for CPB; 3 × for LPB; 5 × for LPMB), V100%RX of the GTV were improved (on average) by 0.13%, 1.84%, and 4.63%, respectively, achieving the acceptance criteria of V100%RX > 95%. Because of fast energy switch in linear accelerator proton machines, the delivery time for VR plans was the lowest for LPB plans, while delivery time for LPMB was on average 1 min longer than CPB plans. The advantage of small spot machines was better sparing in normal lung V20Gy, even when VR was applied. Conclusion In the absence of repainting, proton machines with large spot sizes generated more robust plans against interplay effects. The number of VR increased with decreasing spot sizes to achieve the acceptance criteria. VR improved the plan robustness against interplay effects for modalities with small spot sizes and fast energy changes, preserving the low dose sparing aspect of the LPMB, even when motion is included.

Cardiorespiratory motion characteristics and their dosimetric impact on cardiac stereotactic body radiotherapy

Quantifying dose uncertainties resulting from cardiorespiratory motion in intensity-modulated proton therapy for cardiac stereotactic body radiotherapy

Impact Of Interfractional Motion On Hypofractionated Pencil Beam Scanning Proton Therapy And Vmat Delivery For Prostate Cancer

Detailed dosimetric evaluation of inter-fraction and respiratory motion in lung stereotactic body radiation therapy based on daily 4D cone beam CT images

Impact of respiratory motion on proton pencil beam scanning FLASH radiotherapy: an in silico and phantom measurement study

Impact of the Time Proportion of Respiratory Phases on Dosimetry in SBRT of Lung Tumor Near the Chest Wall or Diaphragm

Cardiac motion and its dosimetric impact during radioablation for refractory ventricular tachycardia

Simulation of dosimetric consequences of intrafraction variation of tumor drift in lung cancer stereotactic body radiotherapy

Dosimetric comparison of four-dimensional computed tomography based internal target volume against variations in respiratory motion during treatment between volumetric modulated arc therapy and three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy in lung stereotactic body radiotherapy

A Simulation Study of Tolerance of Breathing Amplitude Variations in Radiotherapy of Lung Cancer Using 4DCT and Time-Resolved 4DMRI

Dosimetric Impact of Delineation and Motion Uncertainties on the Heart and Substructures in Lung Cancer Radiotherapy

Effects of respiratory and cardiac motion on estimating radiation dose to the left ventricle during radiotherapy for lung cancer

Dosimetric Evaluation of Cardiac Structures on Left Breast Cancer Radiotherapy: Impact of Movement, Dose Calculation Algorithm and Treatment Technique

Application and dosimetric comparison of surface-guided deep inspiration breath-hold for lung stereotactic body radiotherapy

Companison of Dose Distribution and Setup Error of Two Different Positions and Immobilization Techniques in Breast Cancer Radiotherapy

Cyclotron and linear accelerator generated scanning proton beams for lung cancer SBRT: Interplay effects and mitigations

Evaluating intra‐fractional tumor motion in lung stereotactic radiotherapy with deep inspiration breath‐hold

Using 4DCBCT simulation and guidance to evaluate inter-fractional tumor variance during SABR for lung tumor within the lower lobe

Development of a Geometry‐based Respiratory Motion– Simulating Patient Model for Radiation Treatment Dosimetry

Factors influencing target volume motion in tangential whole breast irradiation for breast cancer

Motion-Inclusive Treatment Planning to Assess Normal Tissue Dose for Central Lung Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy