Abstract:<section class="article-section__content"><h3 class="article-section__sub-title section1"> Introduction</h3><p>Pre‐implantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT‐A) is in high demand worldwide, with ongoing debate among medical societies as to which patient groups it should be offered. The psychological aspects for patients regarding its use, lag behind the genomic technological advances, leaving couples with limited decision‐making support. The development of this technology also leads to the possibility for its utilization in gender selection. Despite the controversy surrounding these issues, very few studies have investigated the psychological aspects of patients using PGT‐A.</p></section><section class="article-section__content"><h3 class="article-section__sub-title section1"> Material and methods</h3><p>This systematic review provides an up‐to‐date analysis of the psychosocial aspects surrounding PGT for aneuploidy and sex selection, as well as decision‐making factors. A systematic search of English peer‐reviewed journals of three computerized databases were undertaken following PRISMA guidelines. The qualitative data were extracted using thematic analysis. PROSPERO Registration number: CRD42019126439.</p></section><section class="article-section__content"><h3 class="article-section__sub-title section1"> Results</h3><p>The main outcome measures were patients' motivations, decision‐making factors, attitudes and experiences surrounding the use of PGT for aneuploidy and sex selection. Ten studies were included, four for PGT‐A and six for sex selection. Attitudes towards PGT‐A were positive, with the main motivating factors being decreasing miscarriage rate, reducing the risk of termination of pregnancy and reducing the time to pregnancy. Consistently raised concerns regarding PGT‐A were the financial burden and moral beliefs. The vast majority of patients felt sufficiently knowledgeable to make the decision; however, studies did reveal that a minority mis‐interpreted certain potential benefits of PGT‐A. Studies investigating PGT for sex selection predominantly reported the main motivation was to achieve gender balance within the family dynamic, with most studies finding no difference between couples using PGT for gender selection to have male or female offspring.</p></section><section class="article-section__content"><h3 class="article-section__sub-title section1"> Conclusions</h3><p>Although this systematic review was limited by the small number of studies investigating this topic, a significant minority of patients appeared to misunderstand certain benefits and limitations of PGT‐A. Fertility clinics must ensure they provide adequate counselling to all patients using PGT‐A. With the use of PGT‐A on the rise globally, there is a need to develop decision support tools for couples who have an increasing number of genetic testing options becoming available to them.</p></section>

"I am happy to be alive, but I prefer to have children without my chronic disease": chronically ill persons' views on reproduction and genetic testing for their own condition

"Without being in psychoanalysis I would never have dared to become pregnant": psychoanalytical observations in a multidisciplinary study concerning a woman undergoing prenatal diagnostics

Genetics, emotion and care: Navigating future reproductive decisions in families of children with rare genetic conditions

A critical view on using "life not worth living" in the bioethics of assisted reproduction

Reproductive decision-making of people living with cystic fibrosis and their partners: A systematic review of psychosocial and ethical considerations

Why Human Germline Editing is More Problematic than Selecting Between Embryos: Ethically Considering Intergenerational Relationships

Preimplantation Genetic Testing for Polygenetic Conditions: A Legal, Ethical, and Scientific Challenge

Ethical considerations in prenatal genomic testing

Parent's attitudes towards full-scale prenatal testing for genetic disorders

Parents' and patients' perspectives, experiences, and preferences for germline genetic or genomic testing of children with cancer: A systematic review

The salience of genomic information to reproductive autonomy: Australian healthcare professionals' views on a changing prenatal testing landscape

Psychological and cognitive factors involved in decision-making process of haemophilia carriers in reproductive choices

Negotiating severity behind the scenes: prenatal testing in Germany

Renegotiation, uncertainty, imagination: Assemblage perspectives on reproductive and family planning with an Inborn Error of immunity

Professionals' views on providing personalized recurrence risks for de novo mutations: Implications for genetic counseling

Pregnancy Planning and Genetic Testing: Exploring Advantages, and Challenges

Reproductive options and genetic testing for patients with an inherited cardiac disease

A systematic review exploring the patient decision‐making factors and attitudes towards pre‐implantation genetic testing for aneuploidy and gender selection

The desire for children among adult survivors of childhood cancer: Psychometric evaluation of a cancer-specific questionnaire and relations with sociodemographic and psychological characteristics

Conflict between values and technology: perceptions of preimplantation genetic diagnosis among women at increased risk for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer

"She was finally mine": the moral experience of families in the context of trisomy 13 and 18- a scoping review with thematic analysis