Abstract:Research background: The heterogeneity in the factors that affect demand for environmental quality implicates a diverse set of policies and actions aimed at achieving cleaner production to address the challenges posed by pollution and damage to the natural environment. Even though this topic has been widely addressed, mainly from the traditional perspective of the Environmental Kuznets Curves hypothesis (EKC), it has been assumed that the environment is a luxury good with an income elasticity greater than unity. However, it has recently been recognized that the relationship between income and demand for cleaner energy may be more complex and that further inquiry may be needed for a better understanding. Purpose of the article: This research work, employing a panel of European countries, offers direct explicit parameters for the elasticity of income-environmental quality demand for Greenhouse Gases (GHG), as well as its relationship with other important factors. It provides quantitative novel insights into the complex relationship between income and the preferences for cleaner energy. Methods: A hierarchical regression equations approach is used to analyze the evolution of the elasticity of income-environmental quality demand with the inclusion of further co-variates that are relevant for the preferences side of the EKC, such as consumption, R+D investment and BERD (Business Enterprise Research and Development). The data for the empirical study comes from a panel of 16 European countries for the period from 2010 to 2020. Findings & value added: The results show robust evidence that the elasticity of environmental quality demand, which although positive and significant, does not exceed one. To obtain an elasticity above unity, two more variables are needed, namely the R+D expenditure of business enterprises and the exposure of citizens to air pollution. These two factors have a similar or even higher effect on the preferences of agents for cleaner energy, which also means that the preferences of the citizens are endogenous to technological development. At the theoretical level, this work shows that the technological and preferences arguments are not substitute explanations of the EKC, but that technological development exerts a positive effect on the preferences of inhabitants, whose demand for environmental quality is heavily conditioned by their capabilities to see pollution, even more than by their income level. This also means that public policies directed to improve environmental awareness should be directed first towards those regions where the exposure of the citizens to pollution is lower.

Substitution Between Clean And Dirty Energy With Biased Technical Change

Elasticity of substitution between clean energy and non-clean energy: Evidence from the Chinese electricity industry

Towards a carbon-neutral economy: The dynamics of factor substitution in Germany

What drives the preferences for cleaner energy? Parametrizing the elasticities of environ-mental quality demand for greenhouse gases

Substitute or complement? Assessing renewable and nonrenewable energy in OECD countries

The Environmental Bias of Trade Policy*

Technical change and pollution abatement costs

Decomposing the Change of CO2 Emissions: A Joint Production Theoretical Approach

Optimal Climate Policy As If the Transition Matters

Industry-level Econometric Estimates of Energy-Capital-Labor Substitution with a Nested CES Production Function

Inter-fuel substitution, technical change and the demand for energy in the UK economy

Innovation-Led Transitions in Energy Supply

The Impact of Environmental Taxation on Wage Inequality in the Presence of Subsidizing Renewable Energy

Factor Substitution and Energy Productivity Fluctuation in China: A Parametric Decomposition Analysis

Clean Energy Action Index Efficiency: An Analysis in Global Uncertainty Contexts

Output Elasticities and Inter-Factor Substitution: Empirical Evidence from the Transportation Sector of Shanghai

Factor substitution in Swiss manufacturing: empirical evidence using micro panel data

Energy transition without dirty capital stranding

China's Industrial Production,Labor,Capital and Energy Substitution Analysis

Time Scales of the Low-Carbon Transition: A Data-Driven Dynamic Multi-Sector Growth Model

Measuring Energy-saving Technological Change: International Trends and Differences